• UncleJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    He isn’t running to win. He’s running to ensure Mamdani loses.

    Vote blue no matter who only applies to democratic elitists.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Where is whats their name? Corey? Rorey? Roary? Fuck i cant remember the username. The person who has the world’s hugest boner over hating third parties.

    Someone messege them and get em in here ASAP. I wanna see some fireworks baby!

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    Failed at being governor, and now he wants to tank the duly elected mayoral nominee for the Democratic party by attempting to split the liberal voting block in NYC. Meanwhile, Trump’s buddy corrupt Eric Adams is doing exactly the same as a favor to his buddy in the White House.

    There needs to be a poster on every street corner in NYC explaining this.

    Preferably with pictures of both Cuomo and Adams photoshopped into the clowns they are.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Fuck Cuomo and honestly fuck the Democratic leadership to and fuck Democrats in general.

    Blue no matter who right? You bunch of hypocritical assholes on par with Republicans.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes, Dems have to get flushed, but other than that, this is fantastic news, this is another hubristic blunder by narcissistic political demagogues.

      This will guarantee some level of split vote from the people that were going to vote for Adams again or some Republican challenger, whoever that was going to be. And there will be a lot of brainwashed median voters who have no clue what’s going on just hear the facebook warnings that Mamdani is going to enact Turbo Gay Muslim Socialism that will force everyone to stand in breadlines to get their gay muslim rations.

      • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Turnout is ridiculously low for the general election because everyone just assumes the Democrat will win. I’m not sure taking votes from Adams even matters. How many people are actually motivated to turn out for fucking Cuomo or the incredibly unpopular current mayor, in an election that famously has low turn out?

        The most likely effect Cuomo will have imo is spooking people to turn out for Mamdani. I’m pretty sure his entering the race as a third party candidate will turn out a lot of young people to vote against him and almost no one to vote for him.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        some Republican challenger, whoever that was going to be

        Pretty sure that it’s gonna be perennial loser and insanely racist vigilante Curtis Sliwa again.

        Either of my cats stand a better chance of becoming mayor of New York than that infected scrotum.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Blue no matter who right?

      In this case there’s a better Dem to vote for. But yes, if the option is a Republican or a Democrat, I will 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000% vote blue no matter who. I’ve seen enough treason from Republicans to know to default blue if it’s blue or red.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        “We’d really recommend that you use our product. You want to use an alternative? Well… we’ll leave our product right here anyway.”

  • InternetRando@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    This screams “I am corrupt as fuuuuuuuck!!!” so hard…like that time that Bob Dole got Elizabeth Dole elected from a state she didnt live in so he could get lobbyist access again after losing the Presidential election.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    DNC normally: “3rd parties don’t function in our two party system, there’s no point in voting for them”

    DNC after losing their own primary: 3rd party it is

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      “Vote Blue No Matter Who” reverts to “Party Unity My Ass” as soon as centrists don’t get 100% of everything they want.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      DNC normally "3rd parties don’t function in our two party system, there’s no point in voting for them

      That part is just reality.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s why they sued to keep De La Cruz off the ballot in swing states.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s almost like mayoral politics in one of the most populous cities on the planet is somewhat different than state and federal level politics.

          Who knew

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              No, we are talking about both. Go re-read the thread for context.

              The original comment was comparing the DNC’s behavior at the national level, with a mayoral primary with ranked choice voting in one of the bluest cities in the US.

              I’m saying it’s not even close to a 1:1 comparison

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    258
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Remember kids: Vote blue no matter who only applies to progressives.

    Want to run a campaign against the duly nominated candidate?

    Only if you’re a neoliberal sex pest. Otherwise you want republicans to win.

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      3 days ago

      For a second I had this confused with the Toronto mayoral election, where the former sex pest mayor is rumored to be considering re-running against the person who supplanted him last election

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 days ago

        It also reminds me of the incumbent NDP ridings we lost to the cons because liberal voters don’t do strategic voting, yet they expect progressives to.

    • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Vote progressive, the platform is impressive. The people aren’t oppressive and their art is more expressive - their passion is expressive but the message isn’t agressive.

      For the people needs to be accomplished By the people.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      You think the DNC is pushing this? Or is this just throwing shit to throw shit?

      Vote blue still applies here. I don’t know who told you it doesn’t.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        You think the DNC is pushing this?

        I think they’re going to be more open about doing so as the election approaches.

        Vote blue still applies here.

        Progressives step aside when centrists win the primaries that the party went to court for the right to rig.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          the party went to court for the right to rig.

          Not a fair interpretation of an argument made by a single DNC lawyer in a single context. Also, the primary is over and Mamdani won.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not a fair interpretation of an argument made by a single DNC lawyer in a single context.

            A completely accurate representation, made by a lawyer representing the party and setting precedent they have taken advantage of ever since.

            Also, the primary is over and Mamdani won.

            I’m not sorry that the party’s machinations against the left fail sometimes.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s accurate that their lawyer made that true argument. That’s just how party primaries work in the US, unfortunately. It’s not accurate that “the party went to court for the right to rig”. The whole point of the argument was to avoid a potentially long and expensive case from moving forward. The context matters, and the lawyer would have been incompetent not to bring it up, as would a Republican or even Green party lawyer in that situation.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                That’s an overly charitable interpretation.

                What actually happened was that progressives sued the DNC for unfairly rigging the primaries, which they did.

                Rather than try to deny it, they went with the tactic of saying “well we’re allowed to because we own the process, not the voters”.

                This in spite of their own charter mandating that they stay neutral and not favor any candidate over others during the primary process.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I don’t think the word “rigging” tells an accurate story. I do think they pulled strings to get all the establishment candidates to Voltron into Biden for super Tuesday. I do think they influenced their cohorts in the media to make Bernie look like he couldn’t win the general. I don’t believe they messed with the voting process itself, which is what “rigging” tends to invoke.

                  Rather than try to deny it, they went with the tactic of saying

                  Again, context matters. In a legal process there are different times to make different arguments, and a good lawyer makes use every argument available. This particular argument dealt with whether or not the court had jurisdiction in the matter, so it came early in the process.

                  This in spite of their own charter mandating that they stay neutral

                  What exactly does that mean? Is every member required to be personally neutral in even their personal relationships outside the DNC? Does that extend to Obama who is neither a board member or on staff at the DNC? Being neutral is a good idea, but that rule is pretty meaningless.

                  To be clear, I am no apologist for the Democratic establishment. I blame them more for Trump than the Republicans. That’s why I want progressives to show up and vote them out in primaries. Giving the false impression that their vote won’t count is counterproductive.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                God damn, you’re hyperfixating on one part of my initial comment because you don’t like people remembering how awful your wing of the party constantly is to anyone but netanyahu and two cheneys.

      • buttnugget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, let’s see what happens. If the Democratic establishment pushes Mamdani hard, this will be true.

        The person you’re replying to is just used to the establishment fighting against progressive insurgents.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If the Democratic establishment pushes Mamdani hard

          Sure, and pigs might fly!

          Never forget that it was a coalition led by the Dem leadership on behalf of AIPAC that ousted both Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman.

          They always fight tooth and nail against progressives and roll over on most of the demands of the fascists in the name of “bipartisanship”

          The person you’re replying to is just used to the establishment fighting against progressive insurgents.

          As is anyone who’s ever paid attention 🤷

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The DNC sure as hell isn’t pushing Mamdani, is the point.

        Whether they’ll put their enormous propaganda machine behind Cuomo, Adams, or none of the candidates remains to be seen, but you can bet your bottom dollar that they won’t be going anywhere near as hard for the progressive running under their banner as they have for both of the Republicans in all but name he’s running against in the past.

        The DNC leadership is almost half as corrupt and hypocritical as the fascist party they pretend to be the only possible alternative to.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Nope, that’s what factually is happening.

            Just because the Neoliberals from your favorite billionaire-owned media says something doesn’t make it true.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      IDK what you’re saying, the progressive is the blue in this context. Mamdani is the DNC candidate, Cuomo is independent.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hope lots of people keep asking him about why covid patients kept getting sent to nursing homes that were not prepared to care for them back in 2020. He was looking so good with those daily updates until it became clear they were avoiding or downplaying that question.