A 2025 Tesla Model 3 in Full-Self Driving mode drives off of a rural road, clips a tree, loses a tire, flips over, and comes to rest on its roof. Luckily, the driver is alive and well, able to post about it on social media.

I just don’t see how this technology could possibly be ready to power an autonomous taxi service by the end of next week.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I have visions of Elon sitting in his lair, stroking his cat, and using his laptop to cause this crash. /s

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Why someone will be a passenger in self-driving vehicle? They know that they are a test subjects, part of a “Cartrial” (or whatever should be called)? Self-Driving is not reliable and not necessery. Too much money is invested in something that is “Low priority to have”. There are prefectly fast and saf self-driving solutions like High-speed Trains.

  • tfm@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “I’m confident that Save full self driving (SFSD) will be ready next year”

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I use autopilot all the time on my boat. No way in hell I’d trust it in a car. They all occasionally get suicidal. Mine likes to lull you into a sense of false security, then take a sharp turn into a channel marker or cargo ship at the last second.

    • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They have auto pilot on boats? I never even thought about that existing. Makes sense, just never heard of it until just now!

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Exactly. My car doesn’t have AP, but it does have a shed load of sensors and sometimes it just freaks out about stuff being too close to car for no discernible reason. Really freaks me out as I’m like what you see bro we just driving down the motorway.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Isn’t there a plane whose autopilot famously keeps trying to crash into the ground. The general advice is to just not let it do that, whenever it looks like it’s about to crash into the ground, pull up instead.

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        All the other answers here are wrong. It was the Boeing 737-Max.

        They fit bigger, more fuel efficient engines on it that changed the flight characteristics, compared to previous 737s. And so rather than have pilots recertify on this as a new model (lots of flight hours, can’t switch back), they designed software to basically make the aircraft seem to behave like the old model.

        And so a bug in the cheaper version of the software, combined with a faulty sensor, would cause the software to take over and try to override the pilots and dive downward instead of pulling up. Two crashes happened within 5 months, to aircraft that were pretty much brand new.

        It was grounded for a while as Boeing fixed the software and hardware issues, and, more importantly, updated all the training and reference materials for pilots so that they were aware of this basically secret setting that could kill everyone.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Pretty sure that’s the Boeing 777 and they discovered that after a crash off Brazil.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The Being 787 Max did that when the sensor got faulty and there was no redundancy for the sensor’s because that was in an optional addon package

        • mbtrhcs@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          42 minutes ago

          Even worse, the pilots and the airlines didn’t even know the sensor or associated software control existed and could do that.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The worst part is that this problem has already been solved by using LIDAR. Vegas had fully self-driving cars that I saw perform flawlessly, because they were manufactured by a company that doesn’t skimp on tech and rip people off.

      • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Probably Zoox, but conceptually similar, LiDAR backed.

        You can immobilize them by setting anything large on them. Your purse, a traffic cone, a person :)

        Probably makes sense to be a little cautious with the gas pedal when there is an anything on top the vehicle.

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That and if you just put your toddler on the roof of the car or something or trunk for a quick second to grab something from your pocket…VROooOMMM baby gone.

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I am never getting into a self driving car. I don’t understand why we are investing money into this technology when people can already drive cars on their own, and we should be moving towards robust public transportation systems anyway. A waste of time and resources to… what exactly? Stare at your phone for a few extra minutes a day? Work from home and every city having robust electric transit systems is what the future is supposed to be.

      • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        In general I am opposed to machines being in direct control of weapons. I am also definitely of the opinion that there are lots of people who shouldn’t be driving.

    • underline960@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Back when I still believed, I was excited because I wanted get in my car and take a 90-minute nap until I arrived at work.

      With public transportation, you can only be half-asleep or you’ll miss your stop.

      • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I used to dream of watching a movie then falling asleep in bed while my car drove the 8 hours to my folks’ house.

        But I’d want that beast to be bristling with sensors of every kind. None of this “cameras only” idiocy.

        Someday. Maybe.

      • cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I have a 45 minute high speed train commute to a busy end-of-line station. I can sleep, read, work, or just stare out the window and think.

        Same commute is probably twice as long by car during rush hour.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          I wish I lived in a place that took rail infrastructure seriously. But all our trains appear to be built out of sheet iron and about four nails, oll movement is accompanied with eeeeeeeeeccccchhhhhhhheeeeeekkkkkkkscccreeeeeeeekkkkeeeeek

  • RandomStickman@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Anything outside of a freshly painted and paved LA roads at high noon while it’s sunny isn’t ready for self drivings it seems

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m not sure about even the more advanced self-driving cars. Shit gets fucked with snow and all kinds of other stuff.

        Flummoxes many human drivers too tbh.

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Tunnels are extra dangerous. Not because of the likelihood of an accident, but because of the situation if an accident happens. It blocks the tunnels easily, fills it with smoke, and kills hundreds.

        Except newly built tunnels in rich countries.

    • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Except for the last 0.05 seconds before the crash where the human was put in control. Therefore, the human caused the crash.

  • Aku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    self driving is the future, but im glad im not a beta tester.

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You’re probably right about the future, but like damn, I wish they would slow their roll and use LiDAR

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Elon Musk decided they absolutely would not use lidar, years ago when lidar was expensive enough that a decision like that made economic sense to at least try making work. Nowadays lidar is a lot cheaper but for whatever reason Musk has drawn a line in the sand and refuses to back down on it.

        Unlike many people online these days I don’t believe that Musk is some kind of sheer-luck bought-his-way-into-success grifter, he has been genuinely involved in many of the decisions that made his companies grow. But this is one of the downsides of that (Cybertruck is another). He’s forced through ideas that turned out to be amazing, but he’s also forced through ideas that sucked. He seems to be increasingly having trouble distinguishing them.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          He’s forced through ideas that turned out to be amazing, but he’s also forced through ideas that sucked.

          He’s utterly incapable of admitting that one of his ideas is garbage.

          There is a reason he fawns all over Trump and that’s because both of them are of a type. Both of them have egos large enough to have their own gravitational fields but lack any real talent. Look his family up, they’re all like that.

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          10 hours ago

          He really hasn’t. He purchased companies that were already sitting on profitable ideas. He is not an engineer. He is not a scientist. He has no training in any design discipline. He takes credit for the ideas of people he pays. He takes credit for the previous achievements of companies he’s purchased.

          What is it going to fucking take for people to finally actually see the grifter for what he is? He’s never had a single good fucking r&d idea in his life 🙃 he has wasted billions of dollars researching and developing absolutely useless ideas that have benefited literally no one and have not made him any money. It is absolutely incredible how powerful his mythos is, that people still believe him to be or have been some kind of engineer or something. He’s a fucking racist nepo baby. He’s never done a single useful thing in his life. He wasn’t the sole individual involved in creating PayPal (and was entirely unrelated in turning it into the successful business it became), he didnt found tesla nor is he responsible for any of the technological developments it made (except for forcing his shitty charger design that notoriously breaks down and charges at half the speed that competitors do), he did not found SpaceX and by all metrics involved has been loathed by everyone at the company for the past decade for continuously committing workers rights violations and fostering a racist sexist and ableist work environment. The man has done nothing but waste people’s time stoking his ego and sexually abusing a slew of employees for the past 2 and a half decades.

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Ditto! They were about 1 foot from hitting the tree head on rather than glancing off, could have easily been fatal. Weirdly small axises of random chance that the world spins on

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I still don’t understand what made it happen. I kept watching shadows and expecting it to happen earlier.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          They seriously need to pull FSD if it were just a matter of people risking their own lives I wouldn’t mind but they’re risking everyone else’s by driving this glitch machine around.

        • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          There’s some difference in the fences on the left side at the exact time the car passed by on the other lane. My guess is that the timing of the other car made the software interpret those changes in the input as something moving instead of simply something being different.

        • IllNess@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I thought it might be following the tire tracks but no. It just decided to veer completely off.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I fear the day I’m on the receiving end of a “glitch.” It’s ridiculous that anyone can think these are safe after how many of these videos I’ve seen.