• Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I legitimately can’t tell if this is a joke or some dude trying to do a humble brag post on LinkedIn. So many ‘look what I can do’ posts on that damn site.

  • Redredme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Guest vlan? Smart.

    Blocking 80/443 knowing all to well everything depends on those: evil.

    Throttling to 56k: the original original poster just being a dick.

    Took 45 minutes: Maybe find another job. You’re not good at it.

    Conclusion: The sister was right. Evil incompetent dick.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I mean fuck me, i can build an entire bespoke DDU from bare metal to cool down in less time than that.

    • andioop@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I have a feeling this is satire, and I’m usually the type of person to miss the joke and think it’s genuine

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Took 45 minutes: Maybe find another job. You’re not good at it.

      Bit harsh.

      The OpenWRT guest wifi guide isn’t a simple switch like you would get on your OEM router, but involves manually setting up a bridge device, a new firewall zone, and a new AP on one of your radios.

      This can take some time if you want to do things the right way. 10 minutes to setup with no extra config steps. Add another 10 if you need to move around your firewall rules, and another 20 for random debugging.

      https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/wifi/guestwifi/configuration_webinterface

      Although, you set it up once. After that it’s just a checkbox.

      • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        12 hours ago

        and of course you need to tag the new network on all your switches, routers, APs… not to forget testing and integration in your monitoring system. 45 minutes is absolutely fine.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Oh true , hadn’t thought about that - I just assumed it was a single device

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I feel like when ‘Zero Trust’ first became a thing, the theme was ‘you should have every endpoint under your control hardened so it need not feer untrusted peers being able to connect’. E.g. if you think you absolutely need VPN to a ‘private network’ for security, then you are failing to be hardened in a ‘zero trust’ way, because you implicitly fear that your systems would fall to untrusted peers.

    I feel like it’s evolved to ‘don’t let anything be able to connect to anything under your control unless you have admin privilege over it as well’. Which is particularly a nightmare when you try to collaborate between two companies, each balking at the other’s hard requirement to have admin access to all network peers of interest.

  • blinfabian@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    what a dick move tbh. i get ya wanna be secure, but why not just let him do his thing on that alternate network?

    • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 hours ago

      guess this is satire. zero trust and byod mix well, just isolate from your shit and you are done. block port 25 outgoing and known c2 IPs to not taint your IP.

  • Lor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Kid should be learning social skills at a family party.

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      As a former kid struggling with social skills, I think that would’ve done me some good. It’s easy and convenient to fall into avoidance behaviour, but overcoddling did me no favours.

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I was told overcoddling reduces resiliency. Parents always coming in to fix things without letting their kids try to solve it on their own. The kid may fail but the act of trying and figuring out why it failed helps greatly. Most parents just “don’t want to see their kids upset” though.

        Take it with a grain of salt, as I don’t have any kids.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    234
    ·
    1 day ago

    The real question is : Why did you invite anyone over, before having a guest VLAN set up ? Classic beginner mistake.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sounds like the network people at my company. They are asking us to spend more time in the office, but they don’t provide enough desks, they don’t provide working wired LAN and they only provide semi-working Wifi. All with proxies that don’t work and filters that don’t let me access the webapp I am supposed to maintain, which is blocked for “being a commercial website”. Thanks, I know, I have to program that crap.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Whatever happened to just talking to each other? I’m glued to my devices all day every day, yet even I ignore the phone during holiday family gatherings.

        Nobody’s forcing you to go; if you prefer be on the internet rather than interacting with your family, please just stay home.

          • Psythik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Don’t worry, you’ll eventually get over your feelings of obligations towards others before you reach 40. Life becomes a lot less stressful once you stop giving a fuck about being a people-pleaser.

            • 1984@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              15 hours ago

              For me, i felt like that also when I was 35. I didnt want my family to be in my life since I didnt feel good around them.

              Now at 50, I have again connected to some of them. Because you get back to those feelings that life is not endless and you start to think about that you will one day not be here anymore. And its nicer if that happens when you have made peace with at least some of those people.

              Tldr, age made me think different at different stages. Maybe it happens for others as well. :)

            • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              It changes one kind of stress for another in a lot of cases. If you annoy everyone you come into contact with, you end up alone, which isn’t great for your mental health, and turns every interaction into an annoyance, so you end up stressed by the necessity of interacting with people you don’t want to interact with. There is no escape from humanity when you are human.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The experience of managing a consumer-grade LAN appliance:

      Open web browser

      Start typing 192.168.0.1

      It auto-inserts 192.168.0.12 because that’s the IP address of your NAS, and you’ve logged into it to adjust something at some point in the last six months. You register it has done this as you’re releasing the Enter key.

      click Back.

      Type the IP address again, this time carefully deleting the 2 it oh so helpfully inserted.

      Wait 3 to 5 business weeks while the 16-bit ARM microcontroller they put in these things serves a web page like old people fuck. It loads to a completely useless stats page that has no information that anyone has ever needed to know.

      Click LAN Setup.

      Wait 3 to 5 business weeks while the 16-bit ARM microcontroller they put in these things serves a web page like old people fuck.

      Parse the wall of acronyms before you, click the link that says DHCP.

      Wait 3 to 5 business weeks while the 16-bit ARM microcontroller they put in these things serves a web page like old people fuck.

      It continues in that fashion until you get what you need done or your network stops working and you have to get a pen and press the Reset button on the back of the device.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It auto-inserts 192.168.0.12 because that’s the IP address of your NAS, and you’ve logged into it to adjust something at some point in the last six months. You register it has done this as you’re releasing the Enter key.

        I avoid this by having my router interface on 1) a double digit IP. And 2) a non-standard port

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Wait 3 to 5 business weeks while the 16-bit ARM microcontroller they put in these things serves a web page like old people fuck.

        This also goes for some NAS appliances and the in-dash console of newer cars. Underpowered ARM implementations are the scourge of this decade.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Lol wtf? Why even spend 45 minutes doing that if you’re going to completely block those ports?

    Just tell him “no”.

    • MisterFrog@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The American use “ironically” is probably the only difference between our dialects that I’ll stand firm on.

      My friends, we already have a use for the word, and it’s not this!

      I’m all about linguistic innovation, but using “unironically” in place of “seriously” and “ironically” in place of “sarcastically”/”not seriously" is not happy times for me.

      Unless you give me a new word for irony.

      I quite like y’all, I use that all the time, not against Americanisms in general, just this one.

      • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        To me, the original post was riddled with literary irony - they were saying things whose words meant one thing but the overall post was actually making fun of the ideas the words were presenting.

        My comment serves to state that I agree with the point the words are making and not the meaning through the lens of irony. Ie, unironically.

        Cambridge dictionary 2nd definition of irony

        irony noun [U] (TYPE OF SPEECH) the use of words that are the opposite of what you mean, as a way of being funny

        I respect the pushback though. I have similar gripes with “sarcasm” being used when “irony” is correct and vice versa.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            yeah playing with the three types of irony was extremely popular in early 1700s britlit. early american lit tried to distinguish itself from britlit by focusing less on irony and more on allegory and symbolism. however by the late 1800s american lit came to emphasize irony almost as hard as the previous century’s britlit had, though i think our only author to really do as much verbal irony (saying one thing, meaning another) as that era of britlit was F Scott Fitzgerald in the 1920s.

            i’m curious now how Australian literature plays with irony. if there’s an absence of verbal irony, is there more literary irony (the consequences of the action are tied comically to the action) and dramatic irony (the audience knows things the characters don’t)? and did the divergence happen because our war of independence resulted in the brits no longer using our southern colonies as a penal colony just as they were getting bored of this?

            or were early Australians more likely to reject this device because they felt it was a signifier of their oppressors?

    • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      1 day ago

      I refuse to allow my own child on it. It takes zero effort to see all the super shady shit happening there. I wont have my child exposed to that crap.

      • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I played Roblox with my kids for years and didn’t find any shady shit. Not saying there is no shady stuff on there, but after 100s of hours either it’s suddenly gotten worse, we somehow dodged all the shady shit or the media have exaggerated the issue. Take your pick.

        I played with my kids because they desperately wanted to join in on the fun but the reports of it being pedo land made me create a rule of “you only play when we play together”. We had great fun, have many fond memories of our time on there.

        • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          This kind of reads like a catholic who brought their kids to mass their whole childhood and disbelieves that catholic priests are child molestors because they never molested your child. They don’t prey on children with present caring parents who don’t leave their children unsupervised. They prey on solitary, neglected, vulnerable children, or for catholics those who are willing to trust a priest alone with them. In roblox it’s the same but without the implicit trust of an authority figure. The pedos probably avoided you. You didn’t somehow dodge the shady shit, you inadvertently created a bubble of safety that prevented your kids from being preyed upon because there’s so much easier prey around.

          • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            That’s an odd way to twist it. I must have had “parent” tagged to my avatar so to avoid the nasties.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You definitely dodged the shady shit with that rule. Not just pedo land either, also the illegal child labor.

          • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            When my kids were younger I treated the internet like a large room full of strangers of all kinds good and bad. I wouldn’t let my 8yr old wonder around on her own there so why would I on social media or multiplayer games.

      • twinnie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 day ago

        My sister-in-law let her 10 year old daughter play it with zero supervision. When we found out we told her she should be watching what her daughter’s doing so she went in to check and found the kid talking to some grown man from Azerbaijan.