• Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    164
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The first paragraph is great advice.

    The second one is such utter hogwash on so many levels it’s hard to know where to start.

    • Police that are intending to disrupt a protest are planning and organizing in person, not over the radios. That’s just stupid.

    • Regular police radios are frequently encrypted now. You can be damn sure DHS has been encrypting their radio traffic for decades. I can say, from personal experience, that my small hometown police started encrypting some of their radio traffic at least 40+ years ago.

    • Even if it wasn’t encrypted, you have to know what frequencies they’re using. Scanners only check one frequency at a time for traffic, so it can take several seconds to get through all of them if you have a lot of candidates. This means that you will frequently miss the first part of a transmission, and occasionally miss the entire thing if it’s short. Once it detects something on one frequency, it stops there to monitor that frequency for as long as the conversation is going on. This means that you’re missing everything happening on all of the other frequencies you have.

    • Lastly, RADIO SCANNERS DO NOT TRANSMIT! PERIOD. They are receivers, like the radio in your car that you listen to music local advertisements on.

    It’s fairly obvious that the person that wrote that has never in their life used a radio scanner and has no idea how they actually work.

    • night_petal@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Also, transmitting is exactly what they want you to do. Triangulation of a signal source is trivial. It makes it sound like this was written by someone that wants you to get arrested.

    • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even regular private companies encrypt radio traffic, partially just to avoid getting someone else’s shit crossover.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s also truncing, but some scanners support that. I imagine the op was referring to baofengs from Amazon or something which opens another can of worms

        • FYI: There are apps that convert a string of text to sounds that can be played over a radio then you use the same app on the other end to decode it. RATTLEGRAM is open source and available on both iOS and Android (F-Droid also have it). You can encrypt the text before copy pasting it over to RATTLEGRAM. Secure Space Encryptor is an open source app that does text encryption (also known as “Paranoia Text Encryption” on iOS), just gotta share a secret password beforehand shared via a secure channel.

          So (1) type text (2) encrypt it (3) copy paste the ciphertext to rattlegram, max the volume, play that sound over the radio (4) the person at the other end also use RATTLEGRAM to decode the message and get the ciphertext (5) use the same text encryption app to decrypt the ciphertext… Voila, ez encrypted radio communications over cheap baofengs (assuming your phone isn’t compromised, but you can load those apps on an airgapped android phone)

          Legal Disclaimer: FCC Regulations does not allow encryption over Amateur Radio frequencies. This is for informational purposes only.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Regular police radios are frequently encrypted now. You can be damn sure DHS has been encrypting their radio traffic for decades. I can say, from personal experience, that my small hometown police started encrypting some of their radio traffic at least 40+ years ago

      yeah, my small hometown (i don’t even have fiber internet small oh your gods i’m going to go on a psychotic break over this later this week aren’t i) has their encrypted channel and their unencrypted channel because they know all us dorks are and have been listening for decades. when the town almost burned down a few years back, the unencrypted channel was how the last minute volunteer emergency services got a shitton of extra fire breaks mowed across the county fuck your property lines style and kept most of the town intact

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The whole text is smug and dumb (traffic cones? the kind with no holes in the top???) so I’m not surprised to hear it has all these inaccuracies.

      Police that are intending to disrupt a protest are planning and organizing in person, not over the radios. That’s just stupid.

      They do need some kind of telecommunication. At a certain size, a protest sprawls many blocks and it will ebb and flow and shift around. You know you’re making an impact when they bring in a helicopter to spot. Obviously the copter is radioing the ground. But yeah also probably not in an easily-overheard way.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      All true, but there’re fairly inexpensive radios on AliExpress and the like that do transmit as well.

      It’s technically illegal, at least on my neck of the woods, to transmit on reserved frequencies, but one could.

      • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nothing stopping the transmitter from being attached to a cheap battery and left under the dumpster of a nearby restaurant.

        Sure, they can find it, but it takes resources away from harassing civilians.

        Someone smarter than me could probably design, or link an existing design, to a cheap assembly that broadcast static and made comms harder for these thugs.

  • spaduf@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    How to Survive Anti-Police Protests by Shane Burley is an appropriate primer for demo beginner.

    The Black Flag Catalyst Revolt Guide by Black Flag Catalyst is a more detailed guide on protest tactics.

    If you are interested in studying crowd control tactics in demo. Here are the resources: The Master’s Tools and Warrior Crowd Control & Riot Manual

    CrimethInc also have extensive resources on demonstration guides:

    https://crimethinc.com/2020/12/15/a-demonstrators-guide-to-body-armor-protecting-yourself-against-blows-batons-bullets-and-more

    https://crimethinc.com/2020/09/01/a-demonstrators-guide-to-helmets-everything-you-need-to-know

    https://crimethinc.com/2020/09/02/a-demonstrators-guide-to-gas-masks-and-goggles-everything-you-need-to-know-to-protect-your-eyes-and-lungs-from-gas-and-projectiles

    https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crimethinc-affinity-groups

    Indigenous Anarchist Federation also have some extensive guides on PPE and comm

    https://iaf-fai.org/2020/10/11/skills-for-revolutionary-survival-5-communications-equipment-for-rebels/

    https://iaf-fai.org/2020/08/31/skills-for-revolutionary-survival-1-trauma-medical-gear/

    https://iaf-fai.org/2020/08/31/skills-for-revolutionary-survival-2-basic-personal-protective-equipment/

    Riot Medicine

    https://riotmedicine.net/

    • speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is an outstanding list of resources. Thanks so much for posting. I wish more people would engage with stuff like this instead of clutching their liberal pearls. The Nepalese showed how to actually protest a corrupt government. All power to the people.

      Riot Medicine is an incredible resource and even I could make sense of it as a full-time idiot. Crimethinc are the poets of a generation who few people seem to know about despite being around for many years, and of course the Anarchist Library is one of the great online resources. Shout out to Serafinski.

  • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some other key details:

    Definitely don’t pour sugary drinks into a gas tank. Or leave drywall screws under the tires of vehicles.

    Because a group of masked guys leaving a vehicle unattended does not mean you can just go up to it and do anything bad to it.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which wouldn’t prevent a denial of service attack by flooding the frequency with whote noise as the post suggests

      That being said, I don’t think it’s a good idea. Police aren’t ICE, and in many cases police are the only ones that have been able to stop ICE from escalating further

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also. If you’re broadcasting (white noise) they can track your broadcast location fairly easily

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          And, if all the actions listed in the OP, it’s the only one that’s illegal. It has always been illegal to broadcast in regulated frequencies since licensure became a thing.

          • Cort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It can make it more difficult and time consuming to locate them all. But it’s still easy to find single broadcasters. I think moving them constantly would be more likely to succeed.

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Damn. My local PD and our state police and Fire/ ems all livestream their live scanners from the web, incase someone doesnt have a scanner.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        80
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is a bad idea. Transmitting on a government frequency with enough power to interfere with other radio traffic will get you a police visit. You’re basically turning on a big lightbulb that says “come find me” for anyone who would bother to triangulate the source of the interference.

        • archonet@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          what if you had something like that running in a bag or backpack at a protest, with hundreds or even thousands of people around you? How about if you had three or four people with them coordinating, switching them on and off at certain times as they move through the crowd?

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It is at this point trivially easy to locate strong signals in crowds - iirc the Olympics was one of the pioneers of the technology to prevent illegal broadcasts, and the equipment is fairly cheap and very easily accessible for any interested party that wants it. Foxhunter fourms even have many, many plans to build your own versions of the hardware if you want.

            And that’s setting aside that the strength of a portable jammer is very limited, military radios like the US police use have pretty neat anti-jamming features (hardened FHSS is brutal, just look at Ukraine/russian signal warfare for how hard it is to mitigate) and you’d be absolutely screwing over any coordination attempts by other protesters using cell or radio by trying this.

            You’ll get caught, and you’ll do a great deal more harm than good if you use these in a protest. Outside that context they could be useful, but by turning one on you gotta remember you’re ensuring that you can’t get any help, either.

            • archonet@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              well, it was worth asking. Anything to hamper the brownshirts and their support network, you know. Thanks.

          • chocrates@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re carrying a big felony around if you get caught. Just decide if and when it’s worth it.

            Plus, since jammers are illegal for civilians, you will have to build it yourself.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              FWIW you can get decently powerful (but narrow frequency, most just affect cell bands or 802.11) jammers off Aliexpress for like $300. Thats where the cartels get theirs, at least. The FCC will find you the minute you turn one on though, and holy shit they don’t fuck around, so I really don’t recommend trying it.

              • Billegh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah, the issue with jammers is that ones targeted at specific frequencies are pretty easy to prosecute. You will have a tough time proving it wasn’t deliberate interference.

                The spread spectrum ones that look like really loud noise across many frequencies are easier to get away with but far less effective with even shorter effective ranges.

          • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            they probably kick down your door pre demonstration because buying the equipment with that power and bandwidth for this to work is already raising red flags

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              secondhand microwave has entered the chat

              A word of caution… Fucking around with microwave parts can and will probably kill you if you don’t know for sure what you are doing.

        • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s real hard to find the interferer when there’s interferers everywhere, also triangulation is hard, particularly for a bunch of meat heads who have been shown to struggle with high school education.

          • Carmakazi@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s still a significant escalation of “extralegal” activity on the same level as torching a police cruiser in a parking lot, and isn’t really congruous with the first paragraph in that regard. Probably from ignorance of how serious signal jamming is more than anything.

            It’s like saying to leave your phone at home and know your rights, but also remember that .243 Winchester lead-free ammo can penetrate level IV plates.

          • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s real hard to find the interferer when there’s interferers everywhere

            It’s actually pretty easy to locate a radio source on a particular frequency, especially if it’s a frequency where most transmitters are known/registered (e.g. police radios).

            also triangulation is hard, particularly for a bunch of meat heads who have been shown to struggle with high school education.

            You do realize that not all police are beat cops, right? They have technical specialists. If there’s an issue outside the qualifications of a regular officer, they just refer it to the specialists who know exactly what to do.

            Police have been driving around with suitcase-sized Stingray devices since at least 2006. They absolutely have equipment that can triangulate a radio source - they don’t even really need to understand how it works, just turn it on.

            • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The problem isn’t one strong stationary interferer, its a large number of weak intermittent interferers.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        For two minutes until they just fallback to their cell phones probably.

        Also, you might be interfering with EMS with that strategy.

  • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Also make sure you do not purchase high powered laser pointers from Alibaba. As those could accidently damage the optical scanners of police drones and robo dogs.

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Can’t say I feel this is the best advice when there actually are laws against using laser pointers, it’s a drone as compared to something with an actual pilot, but it still feels like a way bigger risk than anything else in the post.

  • mystik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Listening is legal, and in may areas they use digital modes(P25) without encryption. However, transmitting on any frequency you are not allowed to will get you in big trouble, and they will probably get help from local amateurs that routinely practice foxhunting.

    Amateurs will help, not because they’re cops, but because with a flick of of the pen , rules can be chaged to restrict their favorite hobby. Or worse — https://lemmy.world/post/41898188

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    it was my understanding that a lot of police agencies moved over to digital/encrypted radio systems precisely because they wanted to avoid scanners.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have been thinking about water balloon based defenses. If you fill them with paint and throw them at someone wearing helmets with clear visors or gas masks they would have to remove them or not be able to see. If you miss there’d still be paint on a person wearing a uniform without any identifying information so it gets easier tracking and identifying who they are on video later.

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Be aware that in a few states, including Minnesota, the use of a police scanner during a crime, or to evade law enforcement, can be a crime itself. If they arrest you for committing some crime, then having a scanner will get you another charge.

    • speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because as everyone online knows, all discussions on the internet do and must relate to the US. Even if they briefly appear not to relate to the US and its shit govt, don’t worry, some insular American will pull the discussion right back where it belongs.

      I swear to fucking hell, someone could post about oatmeal and within a dozen comments someone else would link it to Trump.

  • sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Following the jammer talk here and wondering if treating them as disposable changes the game. If its fire and forget and you count it as a loss? Or is it too expensive to abandon like that?