• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I think this is fair game. we blast the rich all the time for being absolute soulless husks that look like human beings.

    if anything, this should just solidify in our minds that we’re right.

  • flamiera@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That’s okay, not like your soup isn’t jacked up to shit with sodium. People are tasting more salt in your shit-ass idea you call a soup than the actual so-called ingredients you put in it.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Poor people buy Campbell’s? That shit is pricey as hell nowadays and I can’t remember the last time I gave a fuck about their overpriced oversalted garbage.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not in food deserts.

      Walk into a chain pharmacy or a dollar store in the US and Campbell’s will be one the cheapest of the 3 soup brands they offer.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        14 hours ago

        And it might sound crazy, but there are tons of people living in motels full time as well, with no more than a mini fridge and a microwave to cook with. Some of the only affordable housing out there is simply rented out bedrooms in someone else’s house - meaning a shared kitchen, complete with competition for cooking times and space.

        It’s easy to say as others have and talk about it being far cheaper to make soup yourself. But the reality is, not everyone has the time, space, or equipment to do that. Having to buy ready-made food is another poor tax, in a way.

  • DonEladio@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Ah…the Adobe business model. Make your customers hate your company and product. Bold move.

  • don@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    What was said, from the article:

    Local 4 News in Detroit broadcast portions of the recording. In it, a speaker identified as Bally is heard saying, “We have s**t for f***king poor people. Who buys our s**t? I don’t buy Campbell’s products barely anymore. It’s not healthy now that I know what the f**‘s in it.”

    He also referenced “bioengineered meat,” saying, “I don’t wanna eat a piece of chicken that came from a 3D printer.”

    The recording, which lasted longer than an hour and 15 minutes, included what Garza said was a “disgusting” rant alleged to be made by Bally about his coworkers: “F***ing Indians don’t know a f***ing thing,” and “Like they couldn’t think for their f***ing selves,” it said in part.

    • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The bioengineered meat bit is honestly hilarious to me, it’s clear this guy has no relation to actual production. 3D printed meat is nowhere near viable for the scale of production that Campbells operates at- it can’t keep up with the sheer volume required and it is significantly more expensive than traditional meat production.

      Dude’s just gone off the deep end with right-wing conspiracy theories, which makes sense given the whole racist tirade and hating the poor.

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The craziest thing to me about this is that the employee (who was very smart to record this conversation) literally used official internal channels to report this. Rather than deal with it professionally, they fired him for being honest.

      Well, I guess it’s time to leak to the press, then…

      Also, from those remarks, it really seems like the VP hates his job. They should’ve done him and the company a favor and fired him instead.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The companies Facebook is getting wrecked by the “MAHA” crowd, which is pretty hilarious. They are not happy about the bio-engineered meat.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “Who buys our s**t? I don’t buy Campbell’s products barely anymore. It’s not healthy now that I know what the f**‘s in it.”

      Maybe, I dunno, make it more healthful?

      (English pedant peeve: food is not “healthy” or unhealthy; it’s healthful or unhealthful. Living things are healthy, nutrients are healthful. A state of health versus a beneficial quality.)

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Technically correct, but actual usage has made “healthy” synonymous with “healthful” as well as far more commonly used. The distinction was pretty useless, anyway. A “who/whom” situation.

        • Aeao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Obligatory “technically correct, the best kind of correct”

          That’s how English works. It’s usage. I think the French have a council that decides but English moves a lot faster.

          I get having a pet peeve. I for one hate that ignorant means uneducated when it should be someone who is willfully ignoring. That’s just not the way it played out.

          I love dictionaries and word usage. “Healthful” is a clunky word, I’m not surprised we moved to “healthy “

          Edit: I just realized “helpful” sounds just fine. But if someone said to me “thanks for being so helpy today” I would be a full of seething hatred lol

          • helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            French moves just as quickly. The Académie Française exists to make sure the French you learn in school doesn’t keep up.

            • Aeao@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I only heard about it because of an article about them trying to find a French word for “e-mail”

              Did that become of thing? Did it catch on?

              I’m curious because in English once something has a “name” it never changes. Hell Donald trump tried to rename the Gulf of Mexico. I’m in Texas, no one is changing the name. It’s the Gulf of Mexico.

              Once something is established it doesn’t change.

              Did they change email into something more French? Does that work like that?

          • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            20 hours ago

            “Healthy” has always been an actual word, while “helpy” hasn’t, so no wonder it’s grating!

            I’m all for language changing when it makes sense. I can’t think of any situation where using “healthy” instead of “healthful” obfuscates the meaning in any way. Same with “who” and “whom.” “Whom” and “healthful” could disappear and nothing of value would be lost. But when it comes to things like “literally” meaning “figuratively,” I mourn the loss of utility the word used to have.

            • Aeao@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Oh and it literally worries me when people use one word to mean the exact opposite. That isn’t advancement it’s degradation.

              And ten points to grifendor for the word “obfuscate “ it’s one of my favorites.

              Sorry for the tripple reply. This is one of the things I get excited about.

            • Aeao@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Knock knock

              Who’s there

              To

              To who?

              It’s to whom actually.

              Yes as long as what you’re saying makes sense that’s all that matters. Language is just the sound you make to communicate the idea in your head to someone else.

              The opposite tho is names. I’m Michael. Not Mike. It doesn’t offended me to be called Mike but that’s not the sound your face needs to make to get my attention. It’s a different sound.

              But for just talking… “I stop speak right but you can hold it, then where’s the rub?”

              I actually would play around by calling “money” different things. See how weird I could get. “Bucks” fine. Doodlyfranks? In context it works just fine. You can call money anything. Since fallout I regularly say “I’m short on caps” no one’s ever questioned it.

                • Aeao@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Excellent example of how names work. It’s not about if I’m annoyed or not. If you want to get my attention you have to flap your meat together and blow air thru it this way (the meat people story if you haven’t heard that. It’s great)

                  I reply with classical works of the philosopher Monty python

                  “Is you wife a goer, know what I mean, I bet she does I bet she does”

                  Language has always fascinated me. Clown too. Not party but the ones who don’t talk but communicate ideas thru body language and face make up. Yes the makeup serves a practical communicative purpose.

            • Aeao@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Omg I just realized my money concept also applies to sex.

              “My wife and I were slapping the banker last night, she got to keep the change”

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, I honestly expected it to be worse. Yeah, the dude says Campbell’s for poor people. I’m not poor, but Campbell’s Chicken Noodle has always been a comfort food for when I’m sick. Putting it aside, it is supposed to be food for people on budgets, that’s the whole idea.

        And then he goes on to say that their product is shit. I don’t necessarily think that’s a bad thing, if you’re saying it with the idea that maybe the product should get unucked, which I can’t tell from the limited passages and my near-midnight cognition.

        The part about fucking Indians, obviously racist, but I’m also not sure what it means. Being from the US, it feels to me like Campbell’s outsourced production or some service to India and is reaping what they sowed, so to speak, with decline in product quality?

        Perhaps it’s an awakening for Campbell’s soup, and with a shithead VP’s tirade comes a rebirth of cheap soup for the non-rich (which will be all of us soon enough).

        I also think the canned goods market in general just isn’t what it was when it was first introduced. We had nonperishable goods in a can. We’ve replaced the need for the nonperishables with access to fresh foods (yes, I understand not for everyone), and canned goods have taken a hit. It doesn’t help that the price of anything in a can (looking at you seltzer) is straight up double what it used to be. I used to get four 12-packs of seltzer for 8.88. Now, three for 10 is the best deal there is. And that’s because you can’t really skimp and water down the quality of seltzer, because its about as basic as it gets, versus canned soups where you can apparently 3D print meat (paraphrasing) to save money.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Poor people can’t afford canned soup, not since covid. Campbells was was 2/$1, $.79 at most. Now it’s $2. Progresso was 3/$5, maybe $1.50 per. Now it’s $2.79 each.

    Crockpot or instapot and a freezer is the way, now.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah the only time I touch canned goods, including seltzer (as I touched on in another comment) is when they’re heavily discounted, and that’s usually something like eight cans for five bucks, so we stock the shelf in the basement a bit, because it’d be real dumb to pass it up at the store on Monday, only to have the world end on Wednesday.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yup. Crockpot with beans, rice, lentils, chopped veggies, a few bouillon cubes, spices, and whatever meat the grocery store has on clearance. The entire thing will average out to like $1 per bowl, and a big crockpot will keep a couple fed (lunch and dinner) for several days.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Everyone should avoid that shit anyway. There are healthier and less expensive soups out there, Make your own!!!

  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The title of the article is some serious clickbait. I suggest that you go read the article for yourself or you’ll seriously get the wrong idea.

    First, the article is basically not about the VP mocking poor people, but about a lawsuit. A person recorded the VP’s remarks, which allegedly included racist statements against Indian people. He reported the meeting to management, and then he was fired. The article is about a lawsuit for his being fired for reporting racially discriminatory conduct.

    (The guy said he recorded the conversation because he thought the meeting would be about his salary, and wanted to get the comments on record, so even if that’s true, it sounds like he knew the VP was a piece of shit who couldn’t be trusted.)

    Second, the VP was in IT, and was not involved in the production or sales of food. He had the title of Chief Information Security Officer.

    In a big company, VPs don’t actually hold that important of a role in the first place. It sounds like this VP was a serious asshole. Probably the VP’s manager is similarly a seriously incompetent asshole who deserves to be fired, but anybody who has worked in a big company knows these types of guys are a dime a dozen. They weasel their ways in to middle and upper-middle management and it is not rare for them to be completely incompetent and constantly shit on the company and product in private. They often form a sort of asshole clique and make entire sections of a company hellish to work in.

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This administration will excuse it the order will come down from the Supreme Court and Pam bondi to excuse the racist behavior.