

I mean if you were in charge of that kind of thing wouldn’t you leave it this way on purpose just for the fun of it?
I mean if you were in charge of that kind of thing wouldn’t you leave it this way on purpose just for the fun of it?
Well that is an interesting list. I don’t think I’ve heard of about a third to half of them. Shocked Borat is that high. Return of the King didn’t make the list but Borat was number 53. Okay.
This is oddly unsettling, not in a bad way mind you, just unique and different.
Yeah Scott Lang’s not an anti Hero by any stretched imagination. I would hope he doesn’t mean him.
Basically not since the 18th century really.
Kinda? I mean you would think so but they spend millions on propaganda.
You Wish It just stayed there. It didn’t. Again you can read about this. It permeated.
Buddy you can just think out loud in the shower, nobody will stop you. For that matter you can think I got a lot pretty much anywhere, though you do get looks in the grocery store I find.
I wouldn’t consider the good place in any way whatsoever to be a weekly sitcom with only situational stories. It was very clearly not marginal it was very clearly one large overreaching story. I would say the same holds true for basically every show I listed there. Some more than others of course. Parks and Rec and Brooklyn have more sitcom like feels perhaps but they do also still have large overreaching stories. Whereas a man on the inside is much like the good place in that it’s solely one large overreaching story.
Be very curious to know Kagan’s reasoning.
Basically any Michael Schur show scratches this itch. The Good Place, A Man On The Inside, Brooklyn 99, Parks and Rec, etc… they all have this charm. They’re about people who generally like and enjoy each other they want to support each other. Their shows about building people up and love and friendship.
Is there any evidence for that?
How could anyone trust those rules would be followed? How could anyone trust any agreements or treaties wouldn’t be abandoned? I don’t see it ever happening. I see a mad scramble. With the conflict and exploitation that will come with it.
In retrospect would you say read the books first or no?
Well maybe then the real solution isn’t creating a new party but doing what liberals have and taking over the party. Just like liberals have taken over the labor party why can’t left is like Corbyn take over the Green Party?
Good Lord so many places. You should click on that link the other guy provided. There’s a whole section about them it’s extremely well documented. When the Anti-Defamation League first declared it a hate symbol there was so many examples they used and documented. That stupid frog with Hitler mustaches with Nazi hats with klan hoods, all over the place. Hell I remember in the lead up to the 2016 presidential election that a subreddit of Trumps was basically all Pepe memes.
Like I said it was pervasive and widespread. People are very good at creating bubbles for themselves, but that doesn’t mean those bubbles are legitimate.
God I hate that little grin Mike Johnson has so fucking much. It’s such a pervy little grin. It’s a “I fuck my son” kind of grin.