CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) — A launch pad problem prompted SpaceX to delay a flight to the International Space Station on Wednesday to replace NASA’s two stuck astronauts.

The new crew needs to get to the International Space Station before Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams can head home after nine months in orbit.

Concerns over a critical hydraulic system arose less than four hours before the Falcon rocket’s planned evening liftoff from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. As the countdown clocks ticked down, engineers evaluated the hydraulics used to release one of the two arms clamping the rocket to its support structure. This structure needs to tilt back right before liftoff.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Mr. Musk, I heard that your failure —twice now— to bring them home was political, and that without your interference, NASA would already have them home safely.

    What do you say to that?

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      50 minutes ago

      With 446 successful missions out of 448 total launches, SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket has literally the best safety record in the history of human spaceflight. No safer rocket has ever existed. So that would be a weird reaction. They’d be worried about a Boeing spacecraft.

      Of course they might be against flying with a Nazi’s company, but that has nothing to do with safety.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I thought it was delayed for political reasons by Biden? Is he somehow still in power 2 months into the Trump presidency? I’m starting to think this Musk guy might not always be truthful when he says things.

      • misteloct@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m super pissed off, my car stopped working today. The little fuel indicator said E. Thanks a lot Biden. Then while walking to the gas station it started raining. Seriously f that guy.

  • gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    After watching two of their launches result in fireworks, I’d be concerned. I mean, imagine being the two in orbit being rescued by Musk. It’s a hard swallow.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Starship is an experimental prototype. They’ve still landed the Super Heavy booster - what, two or three times now already? Meanwhile, Falcon 9 has been launching and landing near-flawlessly for so long that we don’t even pay attention to it anymore. Is their technology perfect? Of course not - nothing is. But I still think one should focus on the bigger picture rather than letting their opinion of the CEO cloud their judgment.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Starship is still very much an unmanned prototype with major issues to work out. Falcon 9 and the Dragon capsule are proven, reliable tech. I’d rather be on that than Boeing’s piece of garbage. That’s who stranded them there.

      It’s okay to separate the achievements of SpaceX from the Nazi fuckstick who owns it. The engineers there are brilliant, despite their boss.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The astronauts in orbit already have their ride home. This is a shift change not a rescue.