• Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Russia wouldn’t admit defeat even if Zelensky was giving interviews on the Red Square right now. The only way they stop is if their government ceases to exist and the propaganda falls silent.

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Sounds like Russia needs to cease to exist then. If only that were possible…

          • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            honestly if it means the end of russia i’m ready to embrace the millennium of chinese suprem– what the fuck am i SAYING jesus fucking CHRIST this is how a finger on the monkey’s paw curls @_@

            concentrated power in the hands of ANY single authority is bad news for the entire species… shit’s gonna turn out how it turns out and I won’t be tempting fate any further than i already have >_<

            …not like it’s terribly likely i’ll live to see it. Pretty sure the venn diagram representing civilians who resisted nazi occupation with lethal force vs the civilians who survived is very thin sliver of overlap if any exists at all, and I’m honestly not sure if I’d rather be emotionally psychologically and spiritually dead from complicity with abject evil OR ALTERNATIVELY just in the literal sense by punitive execution by the rampant tyranny of the state…

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Historically speaking this is kind of the problem with fighting Russia. You can kill so many more of them than they kill of you and then they just keep coming.

      • Slotos@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        12 days ago

        They are also extremely competent in turning conquered populations into meat squads. With centuries of experience. Which should terrify anyone sitting on the far side of conquered countries.

      • Hubbubbub@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        12 days ago

        The word ‘decimates’ means to eliminate 10%. So if used correctly, it means that 30 to 40 Russians were killed. The word is hardly ever used correctly.

        • just2look@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          12 days ago

          That may have been the original definition, but words evolve. One of the definitions from the Merriam-Webster dictionary is ‘to cause great destruction or harm to’. So it is used correctly by modern definitions.

        • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          decimate /dĕs′ə-māt″/

          transitive verb

          1. To destroy or kill a large part of (a group of people or organisms).

          2. To inflict great destruction or damage on.

            “The storm decimated the region.”

          3. To reduce markedly in amount.

            “a profligate heir who decimated his trust fund.”

          While some of the other definitions are “to take a tenth of” or “one out of every ten”, the top three are usually the most common usage of the word in modern times.

          • stormdelay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            It’s not a correction though, it’s misplaced pedantry. The modern definition does not match the roman practice.