• rycee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    What about the nutrients in the waste? Why not compost it, capture the methane offgassing, and store that?

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      using human waste as fertilizer isn’t a good idea.

      human waste contains everything that a person has consumes. this includes disease causing pathogens and parasites.

      if it were to be used as a fertilizer it would need to go through multiple stages of expensive processing and testing to ensure safety. it’s far more cost effective and safer to use food by-product like fish cuttings to create fertilizers.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Engineer here. We arent talking about directly tossing it on fields. We are talking about having it be anaerobically fermented at high temperatures for about 30 days, with the biogas captured and used for energy.

        the new thing to do then is burn the remains and recover the phosphate from the ashes, where certainly no biological threat remains

        These type of plants are currently built on many larger wastewater treatment plants in Europe

        • kinther@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m curious how much phosphate we would be able to capture with this method?

          I know it is a critical resource we are flushing away daily and -SHOULD- be doing this. Just like peak oil there is a concept of peak phosphorous.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            23 hours ago

            In the EU recovering phosphor from wastewater could cover about one third of the EU countries total phosphor demands.

            This is why the EU made tge strategic decision to have such recovery systems developed and built.

      • rycee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Treated waste water sludge is very commonly used here in Sweden albeit using anaerobic digestion rather than regular composting. High temperature composting would kill any pathogens so you can absolutely get permission to use a composting waste system in small scales. For larger scale waste treatment it is with anaerobic digestion, as mentioned.

        The captured methane is typically used for fuel, e.g., in public transport.

        As far as I know the sludge used for fertilizer needs to be certified under something called REVAQ. Some controversy does exist surrounding safe levels of the various harmful substances and perhaps PFAS in particular.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not to forget: It contains a ton of medicine as well. If you want to have antibiotics in your salad, use human waste as fertilizers.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Pathogens are less of a problem, they die off before they cannot infect a plant. But chemicals from medication and contraceptives, as well as heavy metals, are.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          less about infection and more environmental. some people don’t wash their produce and get sick because of it.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      But what do you do with the methane, can’t story it and if you burn it, you release the CO² which was the point of burying fertilizer while it’s CO² carbon credit value is less than the price of the fertilizer itself.