• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Recently there was a similar incident in China involving a Xiaomi car. This led to an incoming legislation that will require all cars to have mechanical handles in case of emergency.

    Tesla alone had many such cases and there are no plans whatsoever to do anything about it.

    Imagine losing to China in safety regulations.

      • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are tons of valid criticisms of China but they seem to have their shit firmly together in many areas.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I wouldn’t go that far… They are really all over the place

          But at least they don’t allow companies to get powerful enough to control the government. If there’s one lesson to learn, it’s how important it is to keep capital in line

          • Wigglesworth@retrolemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            they don’t let companies get powerful enough to run the government.

            Communists: big company bad!

            Libs: big government bad!

            it’s the same picture

          • pilferjinx@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            That is one good thing about state capitalism. Although, it does nothing to prevent party corruption, which has definitely been getting worse for them.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        We’ve been fed a lot of information over the years that isn’t strictly accurate. While their government is demonstrably overbearing, they have prioritized a substantial technical renaissance. I’m sure there is still some pretty crazy stuff going on since you can get a full meal in a noodle shop for the equivalent of a couple bucks, but they’re really advancing quickly in many sectors.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Paraphrasing Louis CK, the things you can do if you ignore basic human rights is pretty awesome.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            There’s a lot of shit they haven’t handled right. Their propaganda engine is absolute, and people disappear for years when they criticize the government in the slightest way. But that hasn’t really done anything with that that’d i’d call pretty awesome.

            The government runs half of the largest companies. They are all commanded to work together, at a loss if necessary to get things done. When the government said we’re going in on solar, they forced the aluminum companies to fill solar orders first and cheaply, they commanded the banks to give them extremely favorable loans. Now, when they make a panel, the raw cost is far better than can be produced anywhere else.

            People are allowed to move from their home zones, but they lose a lot of their government benefits. When they want to spin up a new manufacturing center, They offer to let people move to the new location while keeping their benefits. They can direct the labor, through opportunity and spin up cities on a dime.

            How they treat their fringe groups is awful. The lack of personal freedom and stranglehold they still have on business is enough to keep me from ever wanting to go there for more than a visit, but however everything is run isn’t quite as bad as we’ve been led to believe either.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        My brother’s Tesla has a manual latch you can pull, but it is not marked, and “concealed” by the door handle. I kept using it by accident which kinda pissed him off, because the door is designed to roll down the window about a half inch before opening to avoid damaging the window seal. Using the manual override skips this rolldown, and just bends the seal out of the way when you open the door.

        Personally, I like the interior handles on the Mustang Mach E better. There is one latch to open the door, but it has two stages. First stage triggers the electric “door kicker” and the second stage physically pulls the latch open. So in an emergency, you just pull the same door handle harder to force it open.

        • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Didn’t know that about the E’s doors. That sounds so much better and safer. Muscle memory is almost all you have when you have been knocked out on impact and have no idea what is happening after a wreck.

        • 31ank@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          My Mazda MX-5 also rolls down the windows when opening the door, but its still a physical latch in the end so it’s possible to design it this way (there’s even a warning in the manual that the window could shatter if no battery is installed)

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m not saying it’s impossible. I’m just sharing my experience with how Tesla implemented it.

            • 31ank@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Didn’t want to sound mean or anything, just wanted to add my experience 😅

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Nope. Horribly mean. Why oh why would you do this to sweet innocent me.

                Yeah, we good. I didn’t think you were being mean.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, we’ve got fail-safes, but they don’t work. They make the customer FEEL better though, and isn’t that worth the higher price?

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thats because america only does what makes the most money, cause money will solve all the problems surely. China makes policy decisions on what’s best for the citizens of the country.

    • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What do you mean “imagine losing to China”? Didn’t it just show you its regulatory power and the reaction capabilities of its governance system with the Xiaomi example? What’s so bad about “losing to China”?

      • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You see, china is known (I’m not here to debate justly or unjustly) for bad safety standards. Thus, doing worse than chinas (percieved) safety standards, ie, losing to china on safety standards, is a bad thing, as it gives contrast to how bad our safety standards are. I hope I’ve explained this in a way that isn’t upsetting to you.