Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez holds a slight lead over Vice President JD Vance in a hypothetical 2028 presidential matchup, according to a new poll.

The New York Democratic congresswoman, known as AOC, edges the likely Republican nominee 51% to 49%, in The Argument/Verasight survey released on Tuesday. However, the result was within the poll’s 2.7 percentage point margin of error, making the two candidates statistically tied. The poll asked voters who they would vote for if the election was between the two of them.

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    America has repeatedly proven it will not vote for a woman, no matter how qualified she is

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      We’ve proven we don’t like centrist women with status quo platforms pretty convincingly. Anything more is speculative imo.

      • Ech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        And yet it’s elected centrist man after centrist man. Funny, that.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          The last time there was another option on the table he became the first black president in our nation’s history. Perhaps there’s a lesson to be learned there.

          • Ech@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think it’s a stretch to say Obama wasn’t centrist, but really it’s irrelevant. US voters were fine with voting in centrist men in if they were appealing enough, but once a centrist woman is put up, they’ll let a self-confessed wannabe dictator into office with hardly a fight.

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              Obama certainly acted like a centrist but that’s not how he campaigned which means that’s not what won him the election.

              • Ech@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Again, irrelevant. Also, he won twice, so his initial campaign wasn’t the end all be all, either.

                • krashmo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It’s only irrelevant if you’re intentionally ignoring facts which disagree with your conclusion

                  • Ech@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Nope. It doesn’t disagree with anything, it’s just irrelevant. Two admittedly centrist women missed the vote to the most vile candidate possible, while countless centrist men won to slightly farther right opponents. That math is crystal clear, and Obama’s first election has no bearing on that.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guarantee you a far left woman like AOC is not going to get elected. Too many independents think she’s too far left. The right can win by being extreme right. The left can’t win by being extreme left. Not in this shithole.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’d be good if we could define things like “far left”. AOC may be progressive, but not sure she’s really far left anything.

          She’s about where the Democrats used to be and supposedly stood for at one time. Probably pre-Clinton for sure. The Republicans have been dragging the window to the right for years and years and all the money in politics sure ain’t helping.

        • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Nothing about affordable health care and not trying to actively poison the planet as much as possible is extreme left

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s what they said about far left black men until Obama came along running as a progressive and won handily. For some reason we didn’t learn any lessons from that and went right back to boring centrist candidates afterwards.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The women who were presented to America had many more problems than their gender. I’m not discounting the reality that a woman has to be exceptional to be considered adequate by the electorate, but “America will not vote for a woman” is true until it’s not.

        • mrdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          So the issue is not Clinton being a woman but the issue is the political system that americans never tried to change

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, I just think you personally are sexist and are looking to voters to validate your beliefs. Americans will vote for a women candidate. They just won’t vote for an uninspiring third way Democrat, whether they have a vag or not.