• nosuchanon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Don’t worry, the Democratic establishment will figure out a way to quickly fuck this up before the midterm elections.

    I’m sure they will choose a panel of milquetoast corporate centrist neo-liberal fuck wads for the people to choose from and again blame it on voter apathy. add a little corporate campaign, finance rule, bending to funnel the most amount of money towards their desired candidate and you have the classic recipe for “ Why do Democrats always lose elections?”

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      It is so much easier and so much more profitable to be the minority party of opposition to evil. You don’t need exciting new ideas, just exciting “back to normal” ideas. …and even “normal” can be made progressively shittier every cycle.

      The rich and powerful can handpick their favorite candidates, negotiate a few table scraps in the direction of normal that they’re willing to accept, and call it a win. The campaign industrial complex gets to make a shit load of money.

      Most importantly, their ultimate campaign slogan is “Vote for me, or else evil wins.” Easy money all around.

      Then when nothing good happens during a Democrats’s turn, they can blame Democrats and then the Republicans they handpick get to ratchet things back in the rich’s direction again.

    • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Or they’ll make some catastrophic legislative or otherwise strategic error on purpose to make sure the Republicans are on even ground. There’s always a Parliamentarian or a “Blue Slip Rule” to help the Democrats steal defeat from the jaws of victory!

        • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The Blue Slip Rule is not even a law, it’s “unofficial Senate tradition” that cost us a Supreme Court justice. The Democrats repeatedly shelf progressive legislation like student debt relief due to the advice of the Parliamentarian, an unelected appointee who the Republican have regularly fired when their opinion differs from the party’s legislative agenda. I could go on and on, volumes have been written on the phenomenon. How many individual occurrences of this need to happen before it forms the clear composite image of collaboration?

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So fucking tired of people blaming the “establishment”.

      The “establishment” didn’t give us Trump 2. Short-sighted, immature potential Democratic voters did.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        How do you figure?

        The establishment literally was Biden not bowing out after his 1st term, as he’d promised.

        The establishment was not giving voters a choice in picking a candidate, and rather anointing Kamala Harris.

        The establishment was having Harris run one of the worst campaigns in modern history with the largest war-chest (over $1.5B) at her disposal.

        The establishment was setting up a candidate to lose, because they don’t care about winning; they care about maintaining the status quo.

        The establishment is absolutely why we got Trump 2.0. How do you not see that?

        • cv_octavio@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Because “the establishment” doesn’t get a ballot. The people do.

          People. Voted. For. That. Thing.

            • cv_octavio@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Sure. But I’ve seen enough red hats, and pickup trucks or front porches with flags to know people voted for this misery. It’s not impossible that MAGA cheated; dishonesty is in their nature - it’s actually “cheating” to say one thing and do another. However I don’t believe that they needed to cheat very hard.

              I think the vote was pretty close, and that your country is just full of horrible people.

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Pay attention. I dunno about your area, but those trump flags and maga hats have all but disappeared where I live. They’re being squeezed as well, and some will break ranks.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Next headline, in November: “Unexpected last-minute swing to GOP.”

    And the obvious conclusion will never be drawn.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Republicans can’t be trounced, because they control the active implementation of the oligarchs plans. They either directly implement them if in power, or they signal those directives to the Democrats, who continue to implement the same plans, but in a passive way. They work in concert in this manner, but they must be continually seen to be in a legitimate contest for the ploy to work.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So Shittler will say elections are stolen and illegal when the midterms roll around and maga gets tossed to the curb? And then what?

  • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Really, though, it says a lot about how shitty the democratic party is that the headline says “since 2018” instead of “since the beginning of time”. Trump is a disgusting, rancorous idiot. Everything about him is vile, from his appearance to his voice to his tiny reptilian brain. The fact that the democrats came in second to this human shitstain strongly suggests that the must have, oh i dunno, badly and repeatedly disappointed the american people.

    Maybe they could shit-can their entire leadership and get behind someone like Mamdani. Or just disband and make room for a new party.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      How many places besides NYC do you think a candidate like Mamdani can win? And I guess I’m asking for even a single point of data that backs this idea up, vs just a hunch that America secretly wants to get far-left.

      We can’t wish a revolution into being, what are the first steps to getting there? How do we unite the people, stop fighting the culture wars so we can fight the class war?

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think a large proportion of Americans make hate and cruelty a primary consideration of their voting proclivities. It’s less about how bad the Democrats have fucked up and more about how they haven’t fucked up enough to get voters.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        1/3 of eligible voters went for Trump. Another 1/3 went for Harris. The remaining 1/3 pretty much checked out. Outside of hate and cruelty, is the biggest problem ignorance or is it apathy? Don’t know, don’t care.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The biggest problem is voters who see no reason to vote, because the parties don’t represent them and don’t deliver what they want.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Meh, I don’t let voters off that easy. If nothing else there have been plenty of primaries where more participation could have helped fix that problem. It’s a two way street.

  • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Same as the first Trump admin. Dude can’t govern, and people will respond to that. Except this time he’s ethnically cleansing rather than just doing covid wrong.

    Everyone in the US better hope dems can field a candidate through their fucked up primary system that’s gonna be young and re-electable. It’s gonna take at least 8 years to even slightly unfuck this mess.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      8 years… ha ha ha!!! I know you said at least but I’m not sure will ever truly know how much they’ve fucked things up. I’m 55 and I doubt it will be fixed before I die.

      And if they don’t put some guardrails with some serious teeth and consequences to fix all of things most politicians generally followed in good faith it’s just gonna happen again. I’m seriously starting to believe the American experiment is over. Late stage capitalism, tribalism, and any appearance of empathy have killed it.

      • 0k_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I’m 28 and I doubt it’ll be meaningfully fixed before I die. Shit’s been beyond fucked basically my entire adult life, and just regular fucked since well before that.

      • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah I agree, we’ve been truly fucked since Doge. This might be the end of the experiment, but the empire will limp along for a long time, it’s just how comfortable it is to sit in the maw for us plebs.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only Congresional poll that matters is the one next November, and Republicans are doing everything they can to make sure that they can still control Congress, even if the Majority of voters don’t want them to.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not true at all. Every well-conducted and reliable poll matters, because it determines where campaign money will be spent, where volunteers will be directed, what stops candidates make, and what issues to press on and which to pivot back to stump on.

      Pretty dumb myopic take you have there, actually.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No, I think it’s the only correct take. Otherwise people get complacent. I don’t give a shit if the Democrats’ margin is large, it needs to be larger next November to counteract Republican ratfuckery. If Democrats are not ignoring this poll and managing this as if they are really 8 points down, they’ve already lost.

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I disagree that it’s the only correct take.

          The argument is “Data may cause people to behave in ways I don’t want them to, so I will assail the data to guide people to behaviors I do want.”

          Like, I can understand and respect your position, but I don’t think it’s the only correct take.

          I think that the structure of your argument is also used broadly by many groups to do terrible things. One can debate the merits of fighting fire with fire, but let’s at least do so with complete awareness.

        • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          This is the way. People need to show up in overwhelming numbers to the midterms, this time. It’s the only way to effectively counter Trump’s agenda. Democrats need to have the power to not only reverse course on what he’s doing, but also to remove him from office and prosecute every last mutherfucking one of them.

          • Nyxias@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            It worked during Bush’s 2nd term when the Senate and the House were blue. The opposition was strong enough to stifle Bush from being too out of control.

            The damage may still continue and have been done, but, we need to stifle and slow this nightmare train down somehow. The mid-terms it has to be.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Polls influence voting (people are more likely to vote for a perceived winner). And polls are easier to cook than elections.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There’s another article about 6 in 10 saying the country is seriously off track. It’s hard to figure out the voter that says this and then is unsure who to vote for, but somehow that ends up with 8% saying “I don’t know”.

  • _chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 day ago

    Which is exactly why the nazis in charge are already undermining elections and have been for years. Building up deniability in the minds of their racist voters to make it easier to control the results if not throw them out entirely.

  • HuskerNation@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I remember the poll that had Harris winning Iowa in a landslide that was way off. Polls are shit, just show up and vote

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because for almost a year now the DNC has been taking all the money Hillary/Biden/Kamala stole from state parties, back to the state parties.

    Who have been using the funds to work at campaign staffing levels we usually only see for a few months before election.

    That outreach is working, and no one should be surprised.

    It’s just the goal of neoliberlism is a neoliberal president and at most either the House or Senate. If/when they get it all, they have to make up excuses for why they’re not doing what they said they’d do.

    It’s like when an athlete bets their team will win, but not beat the spread…

    Sometimes they end up losing the game by trying to keep it close. But their motivation isn’t winning games, it’s hitting the sweet spot where they get a bunch of unethical money

    • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      they’re the ones that have passed campaign finance regulations, though. You don’t see any Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders on the other side

    • Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Until Citizens United is overturned and campaign finance is heavily restricted by Congress, another Democrat administration will simply ratchet themselves further to the right and serve the same oligarchs the Republicans do. Very little will change to improve the lives of ordinary people, and once again the Republicans will use that to take full control in the following cycle.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Until Citizens United is overturned and campaign finance is heavily restricted by Congress,

        No, the party runs their own primaries and they can regulate them however they want.

        The DNC and any state parties can get stricter on PACs, which would get a good candidate to the general. Where they wouldn’t be handcuffed by the restrictions in the primary.

        You don’t know what you’re talking about, which wouldn’t be a big deal if the misinformation you’re spreading wouldn’t result in lower voter turnout.