Said it before, I’ll probably say it again: this is why we should never have changed the name from Gay Liberation. A movement based around human rights and liberation from oppression shouldn’t have changed its name from Liberation to Pride. Now we spend a solid 30% of our energy just explaining what pride is and why it should exist, and fending off the constant “why is there no X pride” bullshit. Call it liberation ans it’s very clear what it is, what it’s for, and why there isn’t a straight liberation movement-- it may even cause a few people to genuinely consider if they, the straights, need liberation, too, from the oppression of heteronormativity… Though that’s asking a lot of your average hetero
You can probably dial that 30% down. Even if you’re really that inundated with questions and complaints about this, you can choose not to engage as much. It isn’t a good return on your investment of time, and I hate the thought of you truly paying a 30% tax on this.
I agree with your point, but I feel like BLM has proven that you can make the wording simple enough for a child to understand and the “but it doesn’t include me, a straight cisgender white person!” crowd still willfully misinterpret it.
Didn’t “Black Lives Matter” originally begin as “Black Lives Matter Too”? I feel like that’s simple enough and if we used it today, then at least some of the dumbasses would shut up about all the “White/Blue/All Lives Matter” BS.
I think the best way is to somehow keep it as simple as possible but also make it so glaringly obvious that to say that you’re opposed just comes off as outright stupid/evil. Though unfortunately I’m afraid that won’t stop most people today.
Honestly, you are depressingly correct :( but even so, misinterpretation, wilful or not, is only part of the reason I wish we’d go back to Liberation instead of Pride. I know the name doesn’t have to dictate the goals, but I feel like we lost sight of the movement when we made marriage equality the end-all-be-all, and there’s been such an abandonment of it since 2015. We’re not there for our trans and nonbinary siblings anyway, because gay men “got ours,” so to speak. A lot has improved in the last 60 years, but I wish the queer community still had the community part of things like we used to
Said it before, I’ll probably say it again: this is why we should never have changed the name from Gay Liberation. A movement based around human rights and liberation from oppression shouldn’t have changed its name from Liberation to Pride. Now we spend a solid 30% of our energy just explaining what pride is and why it should exist, and fending off the constant “why is there no X pride” bullshit. Call it liberation ans it’s very clear what it is, what it’s for, and why there isn’t a straight liberation movement-- it may even cause a few people to genuinely consider if they, the straights, need liberation, too, from the oppression of heteronormativity… Though that’s asking a lot of your average hetero
You can probably dial that 30% down. Even if you’re really that inundated with questions and complaints about this, you can choose not to engage as much. It isn’t a good return on your investment of time, and I hate the thought of you truly paying a 30% tax on this.
I agree with your point, but I feel like BLM has proven that you can make the wording simple enough for a child to understand and the “but it doesn’t include me, a straight cisgender white person!” crowd still willfully misinterpret it.
What a great example. Wordsmithing for fascists is a fruitless enterprise.
Didn’t “Black Lives Matter” originally begin as “Black Lives Matter Too”? I feel like that’s simple enough and if we used it today, then at least some of the dumbasses would shut up about all the “White/Blue/All Lives Matter” BS.
I think the best way is to somehow keep it as simple as possible but also make it so glaringly obvious that to say that you’re opposed just comes off as outright stupid/evil. Though unfortunately I’m afraid that won’t stop most people today.
Honestly, you are depressingly correct :( but even so, misinterpretation, wilful or not, is only part of the reason I wish we’d go back to Liberation instead of Pride. I know the name doesn’t have to dictate the goals, but I feel like we lost sight of the movement when we made marriage equality the end-all-be-all, and there’s been such an abandonment of it since 2015. We’re not there for our trans and nonbinary siblings anyway, because gay men “got ours,” so to speak. A lot has improved in the last 60 years, but I wish the queer community still had the community part of things like we used to
But at least they make it easy to identify them.
Which doesn’t help much 😐
Right wingers are cultural parasites and would have found a way to make it about them regardless