• twopi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      In this market absolutely. One could easily flip it to $500k in a couple days.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well, if all “AI houses” suddenly cost 5k all around, you wouldn’t flip it, but I would gladly live in one of them if I can stop paying rent/mortgage.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    That house is in the “so bad, it’s good” category. Vibe coders can only aspire to such things.

  • Lime66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 days ago

    Inaccurate. That house has decent structural integrity despite being a cruel joke made by the architect, vibe code could never

  • davad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Hmm, I dunno if that’s a fair comparison. That house might be structurally sound and just look weird.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      A vibe coder’s house equivalently would have collapsed on the person who purchased it as soon as the closed the door behind them.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Does it stay up? Yes.

    Can you sleep in it? Technically

    Does it have running electricity and water? (Optional anyway)

    Another big win for vibe coders. Pack it up, we’re taking the W home.

  • VitabytesDev@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So much about vibe coding and yet I have not seen any (working) application or project made by utilizing it.

    Well, I wonder why…

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because we are too busy winning! I’m a mech e not a programmer. I’ve built several incredibly useful things: gui production database viewer analyzer, data processing programs, an advanced machine controller, and many others. Could have never done this stuff on my own and would have pissed off a programmer if I they were the ones doing it and product wouldn’t be as intuitive. AI doesn’t complain if it has to rebuild the whole thing because I change my mind. It’s faster than anything at getting me the results I want.

  • katze@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    That is an accurate representation of my projects. I’m not a vibe coder 😭

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Talking to my structural engineer friend about the way we build software makes him sad every time. And I’m not even talking about vibe coding. Yet.

      • andybytes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        “schizophrenic little children with auto-immune diseases and we don’t beat them when they’re bad.” Hahahahah

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You absolutely can regex (some) html if you sanitize and maybe convert it beforehand.

        Btw, why are parsers always built to support the whole thing and maybe throw an error on or just consume unsupported shenanigans? That’s how you get security vulnerabilities in picture formats. Instead of just picking the things you support and ignoring the rest.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          You always have to balance: Do you want the user to have “some” user experience, or none at all.

          In the case of image viewers or browsers or stuff, it’s most often better to show the user something, even if it isn’t perfect, than to show nothing at all. Especially if it’s an user who can’t do anything to fix the broken thing at all.

          That said, if the user is a developer who is currently developing the solution, then the parser should be as strict as possible, because the developer can fix stuff before it goes into production.