• Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 hours ago

    remember that any lawyers that are part of a law firm, has to resign thier position in order to work with TRUMP in order to reduce liability/reputaiton that would hurt the firm, because trump is very vexacious litigious and doesnt like paying lawyer fees.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      What I don’t get is everybody knows this about him. Yet supposedly intelligent lawyers still getting to bed with him. Why?

  • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t work for someone that won’t pay you, even if he says he’s the president of the United States of America.

          • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            His heart won’t make it. UNLESS they give him a new heart.

            But then his ankles will give out. UNLESS the install prosthetic leggs.

            But by then his brain will be gone. UNLESS a new development in A.I. lets him keep thinking.

            We’ll have a 31 Trillion dollar president. Worth every penny that we don’t make anymore.

            /s In case The Onion is reading.

  • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    The problem with selling your soul for something, as I’m hoping all these fucks find out, is that one day you wake up with neither your soul nor the thing you sold it for

  • ClownStatue@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Do I miss the “brutal” price they paid? I mean, they’re merging with another firm to form a massive one. The managing partners will be managing partners at the new super-firm. So, where’s the price?

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I think “the price” is some sort of loss of prestige from it’s feeder schools and cultural capital after offering pro bono work to Trump. I know they lost a bunch of their top associates (really good ones too, apparently) but I heard from a friend who goes to Princeton that a lot of the law students didn’t even want to article there anymore. I’m assuming it’s the same for other big law schools, especially Harvard Law after Trump basically put a target on their backs.

      Cadwalader is like the oldest law firm in NYC, the “Taft” in the name comes from President Taft’s brother Henry Taft. From what I understand from my friend (and her associates), it’s actually crazy that they’re merging with another legal entity.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        the new firm would likely suffer the same fate if they rolled over for trump, it would be stupid for them to do that.

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Who wants to hire a lawyer that gives up the instant they’re pressured? They’re cowards and deserve to lose their business.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sure the partners at Cadwalader are wiping their tears with $100s.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      Here’s the thing, at firms like this, the prestige of being a partner at a firm that’s been around since 1792 is a primary reason for being there. The money is secondary. And being known as the partners that destroyed the oldest firm in NYC, is a dishonor none of them want to be known for. It’s what they’ll be remembered for, not anything else they’ve done.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        also the fact that some firms have a pipeline with law schools , it hurts them in other ways too if they have been reputation of brownosing for trump.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Two options really…

          1. Scared by Trump’s threats and not willing to fight like other firms.
          2. Support Trump.
        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Then why did they do it?

          That the question.

          Who wants that for such a law firm? Who wants to work for such a firm?

          They didn’t think ahead or the consequences of their action. Wildly lucrative institutions don’t sell themselves off to competitors.

          Any assumption that it was crazy lucrative is based on a need for things to make sense.

          • Triumph@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            No, no - the sale wasn’t crazy lucrative for the firm, it was crazy lucrative for the partners who sold it off.

            • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              That’s not how law firms work and not how this merger is structured. This at best a lateral move, with increased earning potential in comparison to what was possible in a firm bleeding lawyers and client.

              There is nothing “crazy lucrative” about this. I don’t understand how you are coming to that beside mistaking this for something like a corporation selling itself for cash or stock.

              • Triumph@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Regardless of how it’s structured, the partners at Cadwalader have to be walking away with a lot of money from the deal.

                • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  A year ago that firm would have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars, at the moment it’s a fire sale. They’re almost surely losing millions on the deal.

                  They’re leaving basically with whatever they were already paid as a partner for the years they were there. Law firms don’t operate like or pay like traditional businesses. Partners at firms like this almost always have to be offered a partnership, and buy their way in. Some partnerships at prestigious firms can have buy-in fees upwards of a million dollars.

                  The partners then are paid a percentage of the business, depending on seniority and managing status. If there is no business, there is no pay. If the firm goes under, or is bought out, there is little pay because the firm isn’t worth much, if anything.

                  They’re basically leaving with what they’ve already squirreled away and not spent with potentially lavish lifestyles over the years.