The issue is law enforcement is run by the ones needing to be arrested.
Were discovering real world examples of why there needs to be a wholly separate investigation and enforcement system with separate control from any of the three branches to handle investigations into the government itself. Relying solely on the public to vote has failed.
Juries are directly instructed that they can make that exact assumption. Destroying evidence means the jury will assume it was damaging. So to bother doing so, the actual evidence is almost surely worse than what they would assume.
4.19 LOST OR DESTROYED EVIDENCE
If you find that the government intentionally [destroyed][failed to preserve] [insert description of evidence] that the government knew or should have known would be evidence in this case, you may infer, but are not required to infer, that this evidence was unfavorable to the government.
Who said I was wasting my time? There’s entire communities dedicated to reposting ml mod log shit. It’s hilarious watching you fuckers constantly trying to censor the smallest things for the stupidest reasons.
deleted by creator
Oh you’re one of those. So are you the Russian or MAGA type? Which dumbfuck propaganda machine that relies on having no individual critical thinking capability do you get your talking points from? Doesn’t really matter, it’s all the same in the end.
I’m not a mod or an admin. But ml is well known to block anything critical of Russian propaganda and claim all sorts of unrelated reasons that never actually apply. Just taking a quick stroll through the public mod logs shows that every day. Just imagine what they’re scrubbing from public view.
Giving winring0 vibes.
Removed by mod
But employees start ghosting them and it’s the end of the world.
Yeah that’s 100% is the lesson of the holocaust. The lesson is of the genocide itself not the specific target of the genocide. The target is irrelevant for the lesson. Fucking psychopaths and sociopaths, the lot of them. We need to filter these mentally damaged fucks out of political power.
Not that surprising if you think about it. Clearly Russia wants real world data regarding how those systems work against cutting edge US technologies.
Revenue is not profit, and even then its not about whether they have the raw cash. Monthly, and quarterly, and or even yearly payment raw cash flow isn’t how any healthy business operates.
They still have to maintain the existing network, continually upgrade that network, plan and test for future upgrades costing tens of billions in additional capital expenditures, and pay for all of the network support, customer support, and marketing, and and sales teams behind it all.
All of that has to be funded via those profits across years of infrastructure planning. If they don’t have the money when a new generation of technology comes on the market, then they don’t have a way to upgrade their network.
Covering an additional 25% increase in cost for your overpriced Apple TV subscription is a very low fucking priority.
No one is leaving T-Mobile because Apple is raising the price and T-Mobile isn’t covering it. They’re leaving because they’re already considering it and this is a final straw. Despite that also meaning they’ll be paying Apple $12.99 for it instead of $3 through T-Mobile. But I guess paying $13 more for it instead of $3 must somehow make sense for some people.
If you mean by Apple, then yes. The Apple TV add-on pricing is increasing by $3 on both the currently free add-on, and the separate purchase. You want them to just eat that $3/month additional per customer?
What am I saying, of course you do. It’s obvious based on your original response. You have been getting this perk for nearly 5 years already. You still get the same perk, T-Mobile paying for the plan up to a specific amount. Apple has increased their price and T-Mobile isn’t going to cover that increase for you.
This wasn’t a couple months free trial. This was something offered for 5 years, and now the economics have changed. It’s not at all what you’re trying to imply.
Of course they are, because that’s what Russia wants. They’re posting an article from a Russian state-controlled media outlet. The US administration, and the currently run by a friend of Putin for over 40 years, proposing a Russian solution isn’t very surprising.
The entire thing is adb am active investigation so we’ll get this, except for democrat names, and just enough context to imply guilt, even if they’re just being indirectly referenced.
Isn’t California’s map dependent on the Texas one going into effect? That was the original wording at least back when it was first introduced.
Of course. They’re massively profitable.
You can ignore half the emissions standards requirements
People want them because they’re scared of driving a smaller vehicle while the other massive trucks on the road can crush them.
They always talk about the ability to move things like furniture or equipment or things like thag despite only doing that twice a year, and rentals existing, including directly from places like Lowe’s and Home Depot.
People are willing to pay a premium because they mistakenly think that bigger vehicles cost substantially more to make because bigger must mean a lot more material, despite most of a vehicle being empty space.
The Christians have been hypocrites for hundreds of years. It’s a cornerstone of their faith at this point.
Yeah, but that’s almost entirely because they’ve shifted hardware priorities to AI and inflated their pricing to capitalize on the corporate grift, over everything else because of the bubble and limited competition. Losing that means little actually changes, they just shift hardware sales back to other customers instead of telling everyone elss to go fuck themselves while they send everything to AI companies.
Well of course course. With the shutdown, the people that fix mistakes like that weren’t working. All as designed.