• Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Suppose they did match it, you stayed, and then everything fell apart. Or worse, they resented your ultimatum and fired you the moment they had a replacement. I would just always take the new offer.

    • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Never accept a counteroffer, they’re just going to use it to buy time to find your replacement.

        • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Contracts only protect you from the honorable, or those you can enforce upon.

          If they’re honorable, you don’t need a contract. If you can enforce upon them, its only utility is to gaslight their peers.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            They can set their own penalties, but the most common penalty for the business would be paying the full term of agreed employment (so probably 1-2 years) even if they want to fire you early. The most common one for the employee would be repaying any signing bonus and/or all or part of the salary for the full term of the contract.

            You can enforce upon any legal and valid contract, but that’s obviously in a perfect world- many people can’t make the choice to take time off of whatever other job they might have found and pay an attorney/stay organized enough to find someone pro bono.

            However, if you’re working with a company large enough to have a legal department larger than one overwhelmed lawyer, the contract will likely have a chilling effect on them fucking you over (which is imo the ideal situation for the type of company you need to do this with, they’ll be on their best behavior)

            • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Again, youre acting like laws are magic spells, and the best use for the paper they’re written on, the most utility it can provide me, is not to wipe my ass with.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I specifically said that they don’t help you if you don’t have the resources to pursue them, outside of a chilling effect. I expect a little more from my magic spells.

              • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Even when it’s not: pretending successful lawsuits against governments, major companies, & the wealthy don’t exist in significant numbers is denialism. The US is known as one of the most litigious countries.

                • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Absolutely. The compunction of individuals within the systems we criticize is our protection against the system we criticize. If not for the US justice system Trump would be Kapital K King. But that self sustaining system is actively under attack and weakens by the day.