• Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Establish a representative council from people all over the world like this project to decide what projects would be usefull. An undefined amount of start-up capital is too much power for a single person to handle responsible so I’d delegate those decisions to as many different people as possible.

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Finance the building of social housing.

    It creates jobs, fuels industries and finally we’d get affordable housing.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Buy up huge tracts of Amazon forest real estate and carpetbomb it with anti-personnel mines so that nobody can go there, it can’t be illegally logged, and poachers won’t dare go there.

    Yes this plan has flaws but can be tweaked.

  • survirtual@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would build decentralized platforms that secure the basic needs of a civilization.

    1. decentralized world-scale messaging
    2. decentralized world-scale data transfers (video, images, etc)
    3. on top of these systems:
    • anon voting with attestations
    • reimplementation of all popular social media
    • distributed gov functionality (political parties as a service)

    Basically I would implement core functionality as a service. Everyone deserves a say in what they consume, in how they’re governed. I would codify all of that, open source it, and foster a culture of continuous improvement for all systems of governance.

    This pattern, if done correctly, could persist for generations to come, and redefine our relationship with governance, exchange, and freedom. The objective would be to most accurately capture the will of the governed, with minimal disruption or life intrusion.

    Such a mechanism would be infectious. Eventually, every population in the world would adopt it or some form of it.

    This would make the world better for everyone, in every industry, on every level.

  • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    i’m dirt poor but I feel like ive already has quite an impact on a reasonable number of people. I won’t take about the specific things that i get up to but community work can reach a lot of people if you do it right. start a food not bombs, open an autonomous squatted homeless shelter

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Youre going to need to start a cult and get disciples. Even with some start up capital they can out bid you so your only hope is religious indoctrination.

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      But first make sure their will & estate stipulates that their wealth will be evenly distributed among every deserving needful hardworking person on the planet, right?

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why? Just imply sending another hitman! I think the billionaires would find themselves feeling very altruistic eventually.

      • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        No need. If they have heirs, the wealth will be split. If the resulting heirs still have enough to be billionaires apply the solution recursively. Eventually it will be diluted enough that nobody is a billionaire.

        If there are no heirs it usually goes to the state (depending on jurisdiction).

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Possibly a more humble answer: Ask.

    Life, and struggle, operate differently in hundreds of areas around even a single large country. Even individual towns might have ideas for different programs that would have varying levels of benefit, and operate much smoother through voluntary buy in.

    I’d be open to fining / taxing the ultra rich, I’d just want to remember it’s a means to an end. We don’t improve people’s lives by “taking down the haves” alone.

  • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    At this point, start an media company. Call it Working Class Propaganda and publish stories that I think we should be talking about instead of what is out there. Explain how the rich are controlling the echo chambers and the topics of conversations so we can’t ever get to solving real problems. Too many people get rich by us not solving these problems. How much money is spent on anti-union, anti-public transportation, or anti-universal health care? All that money is always spent by companies getting rich off the current system.

    I have no clue how to explain some concepts in an easy manner, but if I had enough start up I would hire many others. Promise to never be AI articles or pictures. Explain open source and the problems of having a walled garden. Explain Israel having a honey pot setup for pedos and now they have blackmail on many American and EU elites.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Might it just be better to grow ProPublica, 404media, or both instead of starting a new one?

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        give them all a platform they can dish on - propublica, 404, wired’s great reporting, jacobin, mother jones, dailykos - there’s a fuckton of fantastic journalism on the left that goes nowhere because we don’t have a fox-level advocate echoing it - msnbc is at best a milquetoast echo of a lefty leaning platform.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe it’s just the gourmand in me, but this is also my priority. It seems like we should be able to ensure no human goes hungry. Production isn’t an issue, it’s distribution/logistics.

      • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s a lot harder to manufacture consent or invent conflict if people can’t be threatened by starvation.

        Seed sharing beats game theory.

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    To start, raise the income tax rates for corporations and high earners in the USA back to the levels before Reagan.

    Eliminate the veto powers afforded certain countries in the UN.

    Remove the bs cultural stigma against socialism in some countries.

    Enforce international law and prosecute crimes against humanity.