They’re saying it’s okay if they helped but not saying to what extent it is okay to them, does murdering people count as helping etc. By asking you might get a feel what sort of actions they’re okay with.
They’re saying it’s okay if they helped but not saying to what extent it is okay to them
It is imperialism either way. No matter the degree.
does murdering people count as helping etc.
Depends on who you ask. Both imperialism and covert murder by the state are done in the interest of the enacting nation. And I refuse to confuse these interests with my own (or those of “the people”).
So it’s also ok to condone the FBI murdering people if we don’t know that the FBI killed MLK?
I don’t see the connection between the this and the topic at hand
They said that it would have been ok if they helped. That conditional statement doesn’t depend on whether or not they did intervene.
Right but I don’t see the connection between the two things you are talking about
Why don’t yousee the connection. Both are instances of covert violence by the US. One is a foreign affair, the other domnestic.
We don’t know if CIA was involved in any sort or violence in ousting of Yanukovych
That doesn’t matter for this original statement:
We also don’t know if the FBI killed MLK. Does that mean that we can’t condemn them if they did it?
They’re saying it’s okay if they helped but not saying to what extent it is okay to them, does murdering people count as helping etc. By asking you might get a feel what sort of actions they’re okay with.
It is imperialism either way. No matter the degree.
Depends on who you ask. Both imperialism and covert murder by the state are done in the interest of the enacting nation. And I refuse to confuse these interests with my own (or those of “the people”).