• snooggums@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because I don’t think a 2 year old should be given Adderall without a parent knowing?

    What a totally reasonable and not completely fictional scenario that shows you are discussing in good faith.

    • jerakor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      When one divorced parent gets their toddler prescribed Adderall without the other parent being informed. AAP recommends against it for ages 3 (not 2 but 3) to 5 but it is allowed.

      I’m not saying I even have an opinion on this, but I do think if someone said they think 3 is too young to take Adderall I think that doesn’t automatically tell me they are anti medicine or a bad person.

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Parental involvement in medical decisions is a completely different topic than medical treatment by age.

        The AAP, which STRONGLY recommends against medication has a consensus of medical professionals that medication might be necessary in very specific situations, is the best group of knowledgeable people to make that call. Definitely more qualified than some random person who just looks at numbers and thinks society or politicians would make a better call than medical professionals who use evidence based practices.

        I’m not saying I even have an opinion on this, but I do think if someone said they think 3 is too young to take Adderall I think that doesn’t automatically tell me they are anti medicine or a bad person.

        That is an opinion, and saying they less qualified to decide on appropriate ages doesn’t mean they are anti-medicine or a bad person unless they try to make laws that keep medical professionals from providing evidence based health care.