• AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Let’s just use “football” as an umbrella term for all games played on foot

    There goes baseball, handball, volleyball, and pretty much every other game involving balls that isn’t played in wheelchairs.

    • CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I feel like you’re starting to understand why saying soccer should be called football, a term denoting a game played on foot as opposed to on horseback, is needlessly confusing and underspecified, whereas soccer, which is very specific and unambiguous, is the much superior term.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        ‘football’ as a name has been around for centuries with no confusion, until American exceptionalism led to them inventing their own version of the game. The only confusion today is coming from the US. Your proposed change however, is the equivalent of this:

        It would not do anything except make the situation even more complicated.

        • CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          How certain are you about that? Looks to me like the term football is about 150 years old, and when it was introduced, gridiron and soccer were still the same sport: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=football&year_start=1500&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=false

          And I’m not proposing a new standard, I’m continuing use of a standard introduced by working class Brits in the early 20th century, so that xkcd really doesn’t apply at all.

          • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_(word)

            It’s been around for almost a millennia.

            And I’m not proposing a new standard, I’m continuing use of a standard introduced by working class Brits in the early 20th century, so that xkcd really doesn’t apply at all.

            It means something specific TODAY. You’re suggesting to have it mean something new and different. It doesn’t matter if that meaning was used a century ago, that’s not what the comic is referencing.

            • CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              If football refers to a single, specific, concrete sport, why do we use it to refer to Canadian rules football AND Gaelic rules football AND American football AND association football?

              • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                we use it to refer to Canadian rules football AND Gaelic rules football AND American football

                ‘we’ is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, considering that’s like 5% of the world population that would refer to it that way.

                • CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Maybe in terms of active vocabulary, but in terms of passive vocabulary ~100% of English speakers will recognize the ambiguity

                  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    17 hours ago

                    ~100% of English speakers will recognize the ambiguity

                    Everybody outside of said countries will consider ‘football’ to refer to, well, football, without any ambiguity. They may be aware Americans are idiots about it but it’s not something that comes up in daily conversation.