Are you comparing the murder of someone with the wrong opinion to an ongoing war that happened because irreconcilable religious differences and mutual drive to total extermination?
Murder is OK if somone is perceived as homophobic, transphobic and engaged in so called hate speech?
Well, in this case I have some news for you about the population of Gaza, Hamas and Palestine in particular and the vast majority or muslims in general.
I haven’t made any comments justifying murder. I just think it’s weird how you think murdering people over opinions is always wrong when a Nazi dies, but when Israel comes up suddenly it’s more complicated than that because of “irreconcilable religious differences”
You’re intentionally conflating murder with a war.
When both sides are irrational to a point where aggression, defence, self-defence and preservation blurs, there’s no morally good or evil anymore, it’s all shit.
Charlie Kirk didn’t have a gun pointed at his murderer, as far as I’m aware he did never kill anyone or ordered the killing of anyone. Your comparison is not only flawed, it’s intentionally made up to compare a single person who just engaged in dialogue and used words with two populations who have basically sworn to exterminate their respective opponent (to achieve “peace in our times” as it seems).
It seems like your trying to establish that some murders for wrongthink are ok, it just needs to be Nazi. Isn’t this what you really want so say?
Are you comparing the murder of someone with the wrong opinion to an ongoing war that happened because irreconcilable religious differences and mutual drive to total extermination?
Sounds like a simple difference of opinion about gods if you ask me.
And arguing with religious people is supposed to lead to a sane outcome?
Murder is ok if you’re religious?
Murder is OK if somone is perceived as homophobic, transphobic and engaged in so called hate speech?
Well, in this case I have some news for you about the population of Gaza, Hamas and Palestine in particular and the vast majority or muslims in general.
I haven’t made any comments justifying murder. I just think it’s weird how you think murdering people over opinions is always wrong when a Nazi dies, but when Israel comes up suddenly it’s more complicated than that because of “irreconcilable religious differences”
You’re intentionally conflating murder with a war. When both sides are irrational to a point where aggression, defence, self-defence and preservation blurs, there’s no morally good or evil anymore, it’s all shit.
Charlie Kirk didn’t have a gun pointed at his murderer, as far as I’m aware he did never kill anyone or ordered the killing of anyone. Your comparison is not only flawed, it’s intentionally made up to compare a single person who just engaged in dialogue and used words with two populations who have basically sworn to exterminate their respective opponent (to achieve “peace in our times” as it seems).
It seems like your trying to establish that some murders for wrongthink are ok, it just needs to be Nazi. Isn’t this what you really want so say?
How many people need to die before it goes from murder to war and the killing is justified in your mind?
Murder is a defined personal act that is more or less similar in most, but not all, jurisdictions.
War is a ln act between nations, states, collectives, combatants, soldiers and mercenaries.
You’re intentionally conflating 2 vastly different scenarios and I’m not falling for it.