Everyone saying this has no idea what a groyper is. But I am numb to caring at this point. Every last American wants to feel like they know something special and unique about every notable event.
edit: STOP 👏 GIVING 👏 POLITICAL 👏 RELEVANCE 👏 TO 👏 MORONS 👏 WHO 👏 WANT 👏 ATTENTION
They’re dungeon dwellers who have no real values or principles other than trolling and being offensive. They’re not any kind of real movement, just an online clubhouse. A lot more people than them called Kirk a fascist, but we have a general public who really want to draw lines and find reasons for things.
Unlikely. His motivation was to oppose Charlie Kirk from “spreading hate.” That group’s objective would have been the opposite. He was radicalized by the far left.
Your insults remind me of toddler trying to argue. You should let someone more intelligent represent your position. Someone who speaks well and can use more than a childish insult. Leftists do have good points but you should never be the one to try to represent them.
You are not worth meeting on what you consider to be even ground. You showed back up after a week of silence to pat yourself on the back. Only a childish moron tries to communicate in such a manner, so that’s how I’m treating you.
Groyper.
Everyone saying this has no idea what a groyper is. But I am numb to caring at this point. Every last American wants to feel like they know something special and unique about every notable event.
edit: STOP 👏 GIVING 👏 POLITICAL 👏 RELEVANCE 👏 TO 👏 MORONS 👏 WHO 👏 WANT 👏 ATTENTION
Aren’t groypers further right than charlie was, and had a tendency to refer to him as a fascist?
nick fuetes groyper.
They’re dungeon dwellers who have no real values or principles other than trolling and being offensive. They’re not any kind of real movement, just an online clubhouse. A lot more people than them called Kirk a fascist, but we have a general public who really want to draw lines and find reasons for things.
Was no one paying attention the first time Taco “won”? Lots of talk about groypers back then…
One of us!
Unlikely. His motivation was to oppose Charlie Kirk from “spreading hate.” That group’s objective would have been the opposite. He was radicalized by the far left.
Wow, you must be so embarrassed.
Turns out I was right.
Did you call yourself an idiot at some point?
Your insults remind me of toddler trying to argue. You should let someone more intelligent represent your position. Someone who speaks well and can use more than a childish insult. Leftists do have good points but you should never be the one to try to represent them.
You are not worth meeting on what you consider to be even ground. You showed back up after a week of silence to pat yourself on the back. Only a childish moron tries to communicate in such a manner, so that’s how I’m treating you.
Let’s update em: https://www.commondreams.org/news/charlie-kirk-2673989947
Turns out I was right.
Update him again: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/no-evidence-charlie-kirk-shooting-left-wing-groups-rcna232513
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lone_wolf_terrorism
Who do you mean by far left?
Anybody even remotely left of Reagan.
Reagan the COMMUNIST?!?!
People who believe in a violent class struggle to overthrow existing economic, legal, and social frameworks.
Source on that?
Liar.
Turns out I was right.