Not the one responding to you originally, but your wording does directly contrast “queer folk” with men. By saying one group is funnier than the other, you’re inherently creating two separate groups.
Did you perhaps mean one thing and say another? I can only read your words as putting men into a category apart from queer folk.
Ah I see. I had considered queer folks to include gnc regardless of assigned gender at birth --including queer men – and “women” and “men” as cishet since like, they aren’t queer and cishet women are still funnier than cishet men consistently.
Not the one responding to you originally, but your wording does directly contrast “queer folk” with men. By saying one group is funnier than the other, you’re inherently creating two separate groups.
Did you perhaps mean one thing and say another? I can only read your words as putting men into a category apart from queer folk.
Ah I see. I had considered queer folks to include gnc regardless of assigned gender at birth --including queer men – and “women” and “men” as cishet since like, they aren’t queer and cishet women are still funnier than cishet men consistently.