Sorry I used the wording in the paper to make a point about what the paper doesn’t talk about.
Yes, I’m also sorry that you’re trying to use the wording in the paper to make implications that are not only not addressed by the paper, but directly contradicted in places.
That section was discussing how the four economic factors are compounded by famine and can contribute to famine.
In five minutes, you read some 8,000 words.
lmao.
You’re not even trying to be believable.
Yes, I’m also sorry that you’re trying to use the wording in the paper to make implications that are not only not addressed by the paper, but directly contradicted in places.
Jesus Christ. You didn’t even skim it.