• AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    OMG?! Did he?! And someone published it after having read it. And people bought it and didn’t burn him at the stake for it.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          And people are free to call out how creepy it is, as well as the people defending a child orgy scene.

          And that’s just one instance of kid sex in King’s books… You gonna defend the scene from The Library Policeman where King describes a young boy being raped in graphic detail too?

          • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            This thread is giving serious “depicting something in fiction is the same as promoting it” conservative book-banning vibes.

            • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 days ago

              Point to a single person calling for a book ban. Go on.

              We have all known that the book contains this scene for years. And yet, none of us are calling for bans. One person made a tongue in cheek rhetorical question as a joke, and then a bunch of people came in to defend their beloved child orgy scene. We’re just calling you freaks out for defending your beloved child orgy scene so adamantly, because you love child orgies. It’s weird.

              • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Can’t help you there, haven’t read it.

                And nobody said anyone’s calling for bans- I’m saying I’m seeing people make the same arguments made by reactionaries to justify bans.

                  • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    Not defending a book. Calling out shitty arguments. Couldn’t give two shits about scary clown book. Care a lot about people using shit arguments that can be weaponized by bad actors.

                    Reading comprehension. Get some.

            • DeusUmbra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I disagree, this is more of a “Hey, why the hell is this in here when it has nothing to do with the story and does nothing for the plot? What does this say about the author?” kind of discussion. It’s like when people call out the fact that the goblin dudes in Harry Potter are clearly racist depictions of Jewish people, it’s weird and says a lot about the author. Are we saying to ban Harry Potter? No, read it if you want to (just don’t pay for it) but keep in mind that the author is a terrible person.

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              If it was one or two instances, maybe. But there are a bunch of these scenes, to the point it feels like a pattern.

              I’ve read King’s books all my life so don’t take this as an axe to grind. But you can’t deny that there are a lot of these scenes, and I’d argue it’s still really fucking creepy on its own.