• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    (for example they allowed them to use their airspace for the initial attack)

    Wow I wonder why Syria would allow one of their enemies to attack another of their enemies

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      The new, ISIS/fundamentalist linked, regime doesn’t seem to be the enemy of Israel. They’ve specifically stopped the clandestine supply of goods and arms to the Palestinians. Allowed Israel to carry strikes inside Syria against their internal enemies.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        The new, ISIS/fundamentalist linked

        You do realize that ISIS was one of their primary foes, right?

        They’ve specifically stopped the clandestine supply of goods and arms to the Palestinians.

        By that do you mean the Iranian supply of goods and arms?

        Golly gee, I wonder why they wouldn’t want the country which supported Assad’s regime with a supply of troops and direct Iranian assistance in genocidal massacres continuing to operate in the country?

        Must be a mystery - or a love of Israel!

        Allowed Israel to carry strikes inside Syria against their internal enemies.

        ‘Allowed’

        You mean like Assad ‘allowed’ it? Or have you forgotten Israel’s numerous incursions into Syria during the past decade and a half?

        Syria is not, and has not been for a long time, in a position to resist Israeli attacks. Not really sure what you expect the current freshly minted government to respond with.

        And, Christ, accusing Israel’s ‘support’ of Alawite communities as being against the Syrian government’s enemies?