• ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    conclusion that contradicts Science

    What science? You’ve not given any source to back your claims. Science does NOT say that transgender women athletes and cisgender women athletes are equal.

    you don’t care about inequality in sports or you’d be concerned about the inequality money provides

    How the fuck is this related? Rules can be decided easily, but making it so that each person has equal chance to get money is impossible and out of the question anyways. If you want to, then yea it changes the outcome, but we’re not fucking talking about all inequalities that exist else we wouldn’t stop talking. I’m focusing on a specific angle that has a high impact on the subject and that we can actually have an impact on.

    (who don’t have an outsized advantage)

    If you want to play this game then sure. Your conclusion contradicts science. If you don’t provide sufficient proof then you’re lying just like me I guess

    You’re trying to claim you’re Just Asking Questions, but it takes very little time interacting with you for your views to become abundantly clear. You are not nearly as clever or subtle as you think.

    You’re acting like a SJW and a science guy but you’re just pushing your own opinion without providing any proof and just spreading lies like “science says this” when it doesn’t.

    You’re not defending anything but idiocy

    I’m done talking with you. I’ve lost enough time to an hypocritical liar. There’s no crowd and this is going nowhere. We’re just both losing our time.