• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    stop promoting brave. oh my god it’s 2025 how good is their propaganda… they were never cool.

  • DigitalMus@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not a search engine, but last week I learned of the European Open Websearch project, which builds a new free and open search index. It should already be ready to try out. Hopefully we will see some search engines implementing this soon.

  • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I really wish Qwant would add the ability for me to Seach “1 eur to usd” and just get the results.

    Along with “tsla” and “23 *3” and just get results.

  • Tenderizer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I really wish Kagi wasn’t American. Kagi is such a good product, and I’d be willing to pay for it, but in no universe am I willing to pump more money into silicon valley.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Daily reminder that

    • Brave’s CEO donates to homophobic organizations and
    • Brave is connected to the BAT pay-to-surf scam

    Don’t use Brave.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Very strange to put Kagi as “less private” when it’s the only non-self-hosted option that allows for completely private searches with their Privacy Pass tokens. You can access them with Tor, pay with crypto (not really that private though), and sign up with a fake email. https://kagi.com/privacy#anonymity

    • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It isn’t marked as less private. It is grayed out because it is not based in Europe. I personally use them as I find them the best option with what is out there.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The text at the bottom says “kagi doesn’t collect any identifying data, but does require an account, so it is considered less private than the alternatives”.

        • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think that’s Walnut’s nod to the fact that PrivacyGuides still hasn’t wrapped their head around the concept of paid search.

          I haven’t seen any legitimate evidence that Kagi’s Privacy Pass is any less private than any other search option on the market, but long ago PG defined private search as “not requiring an account” and are completely locked up on that concept.

          Even though just about every VPN on the planet (and all of their recommended ones) require accounts, as do most of the other services they recommend. The world is just so used to “free” search (which just sells your data or your time) that they don’t know what to do with a new business model.

        • Tenderizer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          With fingerprinting and even just IP tracking, I think the question is more whether they can be trusted to not track you (i.e. whether it makes business sense).

  • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    How about just NOT supporting companies? Having an European company control what gets shown to you is not much of an improvement over having an American one do it…

    There are decentralized search engines like SearXNG

    • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The problem with that philosophy is that SearXNG is an aggregator, so if everyone moved to them… who would be paying for the engines that it aggregates?

      I agree that no one should ever support a company. But rather establish a set of principles that you want the companies you use to follow, and show no loyalty if they break this.

      It is actually the philosophy of !PurchaseWithPurpose@lemmy.world.

      • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah I just find the title very weird, to me it makes more sense to choose a search engine because it respects your privacy than to “support European companies”

        I hadn’t read the “Need help choosing?” part of the picture, so still oupsie on my part 😅 I wish it mentioned that it’s decentralized… but considering it’s aimed at people using Google, I guess that’d be like trying to convert people from twitter/reddit to mastodon/lemmy by geeking out about decentralization and ActivityPub. No one cares, aside from the people who are already using it 😅

    • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      For Search, it is about finding the least bad option and hope that they will become more independent. Mojeek (fully independent but poor quality) or Qwant (building own index, but dependent on Bing)

  • methodicalaspect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    For now I’ll stick with SearXNG, it’s among the first things I get up and running when I distro hop, but I’m glad there are other non-US options to try.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Me too. Kagi is the best of them all, including Google.

      The only downside? It’s an American company.

        • Tenderizer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m okay with forsaking one avocado toast a month for a search engine that actually works, but if I don’t feel good about where my money goes then I’m signficantly less willing.

          I like spending money on the things I use. The status of paying customer is an enviable position (minus the paying part).

        • Rexios@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          How terrible that you have to pay for a product you use

          No one wanting to pay for anything is what got us into this mess in the first place

          • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I was thinking about the aspect of privacy. Not only do you need a user, you also have to give them your payment details.

            And don’t get me started on their “300 searches a month”-bullshit. If I pay for 300 searches, I want my 300 searches. Regardless of how long it takes me to use it.