MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world · edit-23 days agoYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square444fedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down1337cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1890arrow-down1external-linkYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.comMolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world · edit-23 days agomessage-square444fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squareWraithGear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·23 hours agoWell… ok… then let’s do the “NONVIOLENT” protests and stop doing these sit ins.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·22 hours agoI mean do they consider it a success?
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoLooks like it. So cherry picking from both ends on this one.
They consider it non-violent.
Well… ok… then let’s do the “NONVIOLENT” protests and stop doing these sit ins.
I mean do they consider it a success?
Looks like it. So cherry picking from both ends on this one.