• Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What does blame have to do with it? Everything. That is the entire problem with cops, they get away with literally everything, including shooting her and making her basically apologize to them for the story now being about her… Maybe your meme format should include one without an actual backstory if you want to invent your own.

    The left being progressives – democratic socialists and socialists, the Democrats as in neoliberal leadership such as Schumer, Jeffries, Durbin, Biden, Obama… etc. Defended as in standing behind them when they’re blamed for nonsense or scapegoated as anti-American. Ilhan Omar comes to mind. Did any Democrat defend her when she was being called a terrorist because she’s a first-generation Muslim refugee with criticism of American capitalism?

    Perhaps while we’re explaining obvious meanings, you can explain why the cops, who were not blamed for shooting a reporter live on camera because the cops have too much power over media for them to criticize, are equivalent to leftists, who are blamed for everything? Memes which are reaches to this extent seem desperate. I wouldn’t want to be in a mind so riddled with logical holes.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      What does blame have to do with it? Everything. That is the entire problem with cops, they get away with literally everything

      Well . . . I don’t disagree, but I still don’t know what cops have to do with the metaphor. There’s no cops in the metaphor.

      The left being progressives – democratic socialists and socialists

      Okay, so no anarchists, communists, or - other - just the Democratic socialists and socialists. I’m assuming you mean voters, non-office-holders and not national party leaders specifically?

      Democrats as in neoliberal leadership such as Schumer, Jeffries, Durbin, Biden, Obama… etc.

      Well, okay ‘leadership’ is good there, but the etc. kinda defeats the purpose of defining that, so - all ‘neoliberal leadership’ ever, say?

      Also can you define neoliberal leadership? Like neoliberal for one, but for two is that officeholding leadership at all levels; federal, state, local, or just federal?

      Defended as in standing behind them when they’re blamed for nonsense or scapegoated as anti-American.

      “Standing behind them” as in literally like in a press conference, or do prior established positions count as “standing behind them”? Are you saying there should be a public statement like a press release or do you mean some equivalent amount of press coverage?

      “blamed for nonsense”, I think you know I need that specified because - it’s very broad. “Scapegoated” is even trickier because are you talking about Fox News reporting or something more all-outlets-reporting? “Anti-American”, as well - you mean literally the phrase “anti-American”? Or something else?

      Ilhan Omar comes to mind. Did any Democrat defend her when she was being called a terrorist because she’s a first-generation Muslim refugee with criticism of American capitalism?

      Okay, good that’s a better example. Except Ilhan Omar is a Democratic leader, which doesn’t match the “left being Democratic socialists and socialists”. Unless Democratic party leaders can be “Democratic socialists and socialists.” I mean, if they can, then it’s a whole other question isn’t it. It’d be more like ‘Why don’t Democrats support Democrats’, right?

      Perhaps while we’re explaining obvious meanings

      “Obvious meanings” don’t scale well enough. That’s why science spends so much time defining things. Political science, in this case.

      . . . you can explain why the cops, who were not blamed for shooting a reporter live on camera because the cops have too much power over media

      Okay, again, cops have nothing to do with this discussion. Just - forget the cops for a second. In the picture, the figure marked “Leftists” is shooting the figure marked “Democrats”. Shooting with a non-lethal round. Something deliberate. Something stupid. And something which is designed to hurt the “Democrats” but won’t kill them.

      Something like refusing to support them when they’re the only option against chaos and cruelty. Which was last November. That’s the metaphor. And here come the Midterms.

      • Lasherz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ngl, this reads like an AI with the prompt, “Be as obtuse as possible.”

        The metaphor fails because the story of the photo is already there. Posting a short story to get to the bottom of what you’re trying to say with it seems like it doesn’t serve the purpose…

        Actually, after checking your account, I’m going to conclude that maybe someone with a year activity shouldn’t have 20x + more comments than someone who is already on Lemmy too much… Seems like the game is to waste maximal time or generate the most engagement with responses that are generated, in my opinion… Comments themselves seem low effort until this very specific topic. Idk, I stopped caring while typing this.

        • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Idk, I stopped caring while typing this.

          And there it is. The so-called-left’s commitment to a national political presence, the barest minimum required for federal governance. Hate the Dems, do sweet fuckall the rest of the time.