idk why I kinda cringe every time…

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I don’t mind the use of chess as a shorthand for ‘battle of wits’ but I object to how badly written they usually are. Bad Genius hasn’t noticed, and isn’t expecting, a Queen sacrifice move by Good Genius? Please.

    As bad as poker. Every round of poker in movies is a smorgasbord of high value hands:

    “But can you beat a full house, Queens over nines?”
    “I also have a full house, Kings over Jacks.”
    “I have four 10s.”
    “I have a Royal Flush.”
    “I have six Aces.”

    Everyone gasps!

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      This always bothers me so much! It always comes down to one hand, and it’s ALWAYS presented prior to the deal, that this is the hand that has to win, and the hero gets a royal flush.

      Oh wow. He got REALLY lucky and it required no skill at all. 🙄

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I guess I’m a bit confused what is meant by battle of wits, is it supposed to mean, like two super geniuses going at each other? Or?

      Because there are 7 year olds that would wipe the floor with me in chess, but get absolutely sent into the shadow realm in every other category mental or physical lol

      Chess is a game and being good at it, maybe means you are disciplined? Patient? But intelligent, not really, not any more than any other average person or gamer.

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      That poker hands reminded me of the episode in Malcolm in the Middle where they’re playing and suddenly realize there are 6 5s in the deck