• Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      2 days ago

      This solution always made sense to me:

      Another solution is to place tolerance in the context of social contract theory: to wit, tolerance should not be considered a virtue or moral principle, but rather an unspoken agreement within society to tolerate one another’s differences as long as no harm to others arises from same. In this formulation, one being intolerant is violating the contract, and therefore is no longer protected by it against the rest of society.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance?wprov=sfla1

      • Darkard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Spot on.

        I said this before and a bunch of Nazis down voted it because they didn’t like me opening them up to getting thier shit kicked in

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            They exist here. Not to be confused with the Tankies, who hold almost identical views but with a coat of red paint.

            • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              So Tankies, Republicans, Russians, Independents and Greens (which are secret Rs), and Nazis are all Nazis, as is everyone who sits at the table with any of these Nazi flavors, exceptions to this rule including but not limited to Ukrainians, Chinese, Indians, North Koreans, Iran, and Democrats.

              • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Nazis are nazis. None of the other things you listed are nazis. Even the comment you are replying to did not say they are nazis, they said they hold similar views to nazis. There are people in the US right now who say “I am a nazi.” Those people are nazis. This is probably the worst comment to reply to for that gotcha.

                • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  So you CAN sit at a table with Nazis and not be a Nazi!? This is really going to shake things up!

                  Your comment is not the worst, hold your chin up

                  • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    No one in this whole reply chain said that. Even if they did, I usually interpret people’s words, so when someone says “sitting at the table with a nazi makes you a nazi” it means to me “not fighting evil makes you complicit in that evil.” If they mean it literally makes you a nazi, then they are wrong, but I usually assume people aren’t saying things that are insane since everyone I have talked to when asked has said the 1st one.

              • chaogomu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                No, all authoritarians are basically the same kind of asshole, and Tankies are pure authoritarians.

                And since the very first use of the terms left vs right, was a question of Authoritarianism vs Democracy, a question of unelected monarchy vs the power of the people.

                Only later were economic terms added, because Marx envisioned a truly democratic economy.

                And then Lenin betrayed the revolution, and then wrote about how betrayal of the revolution and establishment of a dictatorship was what Marx wanted.

                Lenin had the actual communists who won the November 1917 election arrested as traitors.

                If you are authoritarian, you are not of the left. Full stop.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’ve been here a couple years and haven’t seen any notable indication that Nazis are on this platform

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            There used to be an entire instance of them called Exploding Heads. Pretty much every instance has defederated on them, so I don’t know if that server is still alive. There’s always more nazi servers being made to get around defederation, but they usually end up re-quarantined eventually

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I refer to it as the tolerance pact. I’ll tolerate the weird things you do, so long as they don’t significantly affect the unwilling. In return, I expect you to tolerate the same from my weird stuff.

      There’s also a slightly weaker addition where I will help stand up for those that are both under the pact and under attack. (“They came for…”)

      Nazis and an alarming section of the political right are breaking that pact. They are void of protection by it.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      The whole tolerance false dichotomy thing lacking nuance.

      • finitebanjo@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Not really. It’s the same principle as being able and willing to defend yourself, or being antifascist. Those who bring violence and cause harm can no longer be tolerated, given concessions, or be treated amicably in any way.

        I understand the whole Ghandi approach and “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”, I understand that Daryl Davis’ approach is effective to convert racists, but that only applies in the assumption that we all have protected human rights. We can’t afford to be converting racists 1 at a time when millions of victims are being sent off to labour camps for profit.