So they’re not actively enforcing the weird grey area they made by defining only one THC cannabinoid, and allowing derivatives that don’t have to conform to the same level.
Is it that surprising that they fucked up trying to define something they don’t actually understand? Although it’s more likely the loophole was intentionally made by the lobbyists for the various cannabis companies that actually wrote that part of the bill, as is tradition now.
There are many many farms and vendors who sell online and legally ship via usps to most states. Hoku, Flow, wildwood, holy city, and dozens more.
So they’re not actively enforcing the weird grey area they made by defining only one THC cannabinoid, and allowing derivatives that don’t have to conform to the same level.
Is it that surprising that they fucked up trying to define something they don’t actually understand? Although it’s more likely the loophole was intentionally made by the lobbyists for the various cannabis companies that actually wrote that part of the bill, as is tradition now.
Definitely intentional. DEA tried to argue against thca years ago and courts said to follow as written.
Big canna is fighting it because it shows almost anything to be called hemp and sold without regulation, lot numbers, etc.
deleted by creator