• jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Internet is so fucking weird sometimes. I had literally never heard of the 37% / Secretary Problem until this morning when someone else commented about it in a different thread. Then I immediately noticed it in this comic and saw your comment.

      It’s like when you never notice a car until you buy one and then see that same car everywhere.

    • NerdyPopRocks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      I came here to say this as well! Ofc it’s severely undercounting when you consider the problem where the candidate must choose you back. So lucky him!

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Exactly, it is just taken into account in their evaluation. A person respecting consent will just reevaluate that relationship opportunity as 0 and move on to the next candidate or stay alone.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think it does. For it to work, you’d need to be trying to find the first candidate in the 63% who would choose you back who is better than the best candidate in the 37% who would choose you back. If you can’t verify that last part then it won’t work I think.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    If there was some non-consensual sex that the woman weirdly likes, this would be an Ayn Rand fan fic.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    These cost cutting bean counter types are killing society and the planet. Fuck these people.

    • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      If I had to say which group of people were killing the planet, I’d say it’s people who don’t think about things at all and just do whatever they’re told. You know, people with authoritarian personalities.

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I think the authoritarian personalities usually make the demands themselves, and do the twisting and manipulation of “getting things done”.

        But I get who you mean… The easily molded “patriots” who obey and do whatevers asked of them. The ones who go along fully and enthusiastically with the narrative authorities give them… Because they too want to see and conduct the violence.

          • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Oh, I thought you were just using it generically rather than as a technical term. Actually I also didn’t know it had a follower aspect to it.

            I do like how Adorno tested for it by way of inference, giving people tests on how they would raise a child to reveal their preferences for fascist rules. Very clever.

            I think there’s a part in “Minima moralia: Reflections on a damaged life” where he discusses his school bullies, and their obsession with navy tattoos which suggests a certain Authoritarian personality was sweeping Germany at the time. I guess that’s like Trump supporters today when they go all Karen, or how there’s a rise in rightwing views in young men.