I get it. Their smiles are definitely fake.
But nope, that’s just the finest Turkish silk (literally) in a nice 4 leaf fold. Though I’m preferential to a 2 point puff, it’s cooler and looks less AI generic
I get it. Their smiles are definitely fake.
But nope, that’s just the finest Turkish silk (literally) in a nice 4 leaf fold. Though I’m preferential to a 2 point puff, it’s cooler and looks less AI generic
And you have a problem resulting to insults when you are not being understood rather than trying harder to communicate.
You are making up a stance that I don’t have to think you are controlling the conversation.
Also, adding times did not make your position any more clear. Please clarify your evidence and what you are taking away from that article.
They audited less than 40 fewer than smaller businesses?
What?
I think you misread the article or I am having a hard time parsing the meaning of that sentence.
During the 5 year gap from 2019 to 2024 they only flagged 22 ultra wealthy companies cases vs 848 flags for small companies and that doesn’t mean a full audit was done just referred. And that’s the 40 times fewer, the number of flagged criminal referrals.
I really don’t think you read that. I think you really are looking for bias confirming items and even gloss over presented data.
Take a second and breath and think that it might be ok to progress your views beyond what you already think you know.
Or please point out to me your evidence?
Me laughing proves the DNC is a progressive party? I don’t think that logic is very robust.
I think it makes you feel more confident in disregarding the arguments of others which is the point you want to conclude but it’s unrelated to your previous point and that’s searching for evidence to back your preconceived notion which is also bad science.
Plus this isn’t science or a polling sample it’s a conversation.
So much wrong with how you interact with others.
No, they really don’t. They throw more money at customer service but they definitely don’t audit more and leadership knows that.
HA
Oh boy shortest standup routine to get me to laugh that hard.
Laws are a concept that only some of us seem to agree upon and has no real world repercussions for the wealthy since they aren’t like laws of physics and are only enforced for those that can’t afford to negate them.
Not knowing how things will go is just how the world works. We need leadership that at least tries and pushes for change and asks around for support making it, not money to vote yes.
This has all the typos of a very passionately typed comment and all dripping sarcasm of someone very defeated.
Shit sucks.
LOL that’s literally Eric Adams and Karen Bass the mayors of NYC and LA.
Adams took bribes and is now best friends with Trump and Bass “saved money” by cutting the budget for firefighters and then went to an oligarch cocktail party in Ghana during fire season and fired the fire chief who criticized her.
Both sent the police hard after protestors and have been praised by Democrat leadership for being outstanding members of the party.
I mean there were no instructions up front because literally Google is refusing to give them, basically.
No more choice just the company force feeding the user and saying it’s good for them.
Nowhere in the email or any of the Support pages did Google say how to remove all Gemini integrations from my phone.
I then emailed Google PR and… I asked if someone could provide actionable guidance for my readers who want to ensure Gemini integrations are completely disabled. Instead of answering the question, the person responding to my email wrote, in part: “This update is good for users: they can now use Gemini to complete daily tasks on their mobile devices like send messages, initiate phone calls, and set timers while Gemini Apps Activity is turned off. With Gemini Apps Activity turned off, their Gemini chats are not being reviewed or used to improve our AI models.”
Literally that reads like you can’t turn it off and they just scrape less of your data on a technicality.
Tech is silly sometimes.
Yup yup!
The maps are as misleading as a Verizon coverage map. And Kornacki at the board saying it really only matters for the counties that have millions of votes vs all the tiny counties that come in immediately cause they have 10,000 people living there.
I think the problem is that we have accept these counties do matter though. A state being 3 blue and the rest red even if it’s where everyone lives is blue means that the land is voting. Very heavily too. And stuff like electoral votes being so many for this less populated land means we have to take it into account. So losing 1,000 battles but losing the war sounds like losing to me.
Sorry you dont want to accept that you are responsible for your own actions and words even if we can’t control others.
Nope. You are adding extra context that isn’t part of this and deciding you are allowed something because of others.
I’m just calling your way of interacting with others repugnant cause I am seeing it and it feels worth calling out.
I don’t get it actually. I think you are relying on me getting some of those terms and I am not.
Sorry.
Ew. What rude way to talk to people.
Yup, that sells her as evil way more than shitty recycling.
Oh just brag about stealing my wife, why don’t you!