Andrew K comes across as a generally nice person IMHO.

Its third-party tool appears to have AI capabilities

Phew!

I don’t think men need a protected category for most sports, so having both would just be duplication.

That explains it being like the 90s. That’s Australia in general. New Zealand is more like the 70s.

Depends on what stage of life you’re at.

I realise it’s a shot across the bow, but the intent seems to be to cause distress. Not to cause damage or steal secrets. Right now they seem to be achieving their goal.

That’s why you’re a random rube on the internet and not a member of the Joint Chiefs.

A fair point. They’ll be much better informed than me on what the real tangible threat is. All I’m saying is that it’s not clear to me what the threat is.

Thanks for saving me the click.

Just make the mens competition an “open” competition so that anybody can qualify if they can. A trans-woman competing in the “open” category would be no problem.

Other categories can then stay protected.

Wish they’d be more precise. Are they armed drones? If not…who cares. If we’re just talking DJI knockoffs then even if they are piloted by russians I think we’d be better off ignoring them.

Doesn’t interviewing a potential witness count as investigating Trump?

Maybe, but we’d still like them to try.

Damn. He was politically active recently trying to push environmental policy. He was a great spokesperson for that kind of thing given his history.

That’s a bit young to go.

I’m assuming the duck’s on top

They probably are. They’re trying to make sure it hasn’t leaked onto archive.is.

“…and we’ll tax EVs 3p a mile”

Israel does. Compulsory service.

Well he found out about the sub-prime mortgage fiasco by looking at the public filings that nobody bothers reading. All of the companies involved are public companies that have to file accounts. He’ll be tracing what’s going on and painting himself a picture.

Not sure if it’s exactly the same kit but you can get that for £300 in the UK.

Does this mean Portland should deploy bears to deal with soldier attacks?

Every military ever.

The concept that a soldier is able to disobey an illegal order is flawed. The first thing that happens to them is being thrown in jail awaiting court martial. It’s then on them to prove the order illegal be ause the presumption is that it was legal. It becomes one person against the whole military apparatus.

The penalty if found guilty of refusing to obey orders? At minimum (in the US) a dishonorable discharge. At most a room on death row.

I still think soldier should refuse illegal orders, but the system is setup so they don’t.