dream_weasel

There are some anomalies but it’s still generally true.

Uh yes. If you can’t touch type, prioritize it. The speedup alone is worth it.

You would probably be fine depending on your color :/

I see your pedantry and raise you my own:

There are absolutely languages nobody speaks in your region even if you live in a city.

I therefore choose sign language or Assembly.

And I’m sitting here wondering how I never heard he died in the first place. Before a few minutes ago I would have said he’s still serving time in Siberia.

It’s unclear how they even find the dog’s wife, but yes.

You can think whatever you like. It doesn’t seem cut and dry, even by known and overwhelming prevalence of Texas honor killings and alcoholics who are overwhelmed by 2 glasses of wine.

Indistinguishable facts from just an inexperienced idiot gun owner.

Get a better ad blocker, I don’t pay for BBC and I can see the whole thing. Also don’t be a twat, there’s no need for it.

The Indiana one is super white, super rich, and also super liberal.

Am I crazy for expecting to see the exchange quotes in here somewhere?

You can believe whatever you like, but the title of the article should match the content, and you should read the content before you decide. It sounds like you did read it so good on you.

Based on my read of it, there’s definitely enough reasonable doubt that I’m not comfortable saying this guy murdered his daughter based on the content provided. I updated my original comment to say why.

The article literally says it’s a Glock 9mm. It also says 2 500 mL boxes whoch he claims to have had 1. That’s like 2/3 a bottle, not like a box of franzia. I appreciate being a lifelong shooter (me too), but this was the dudes first gun, and he’s a British immigrant as an adult. All of it taken together, yeah seems like reasonable doubt to me.

You could find the details by reading the whole article.

Then you apparently didn’t read it.

It was a negligent discharge unrelated to the argument. This is a shitty article title and dad is a shitty gun owner and shitty dad tbf, but it wasnt political thing. You can really tell in the comments who read the whole article and who just started commenting. Even the summary doesn’t cover it right.

Edit:

Rather than keep rewriting, this dude is an asshole, however:

1. There was no indictment by grand jury. That means they went through jury selection and heard evidence and a majority of the jurors were not convinced. Counsel for defense AND prosecution agree to jurors, so it’s not like it’s a maga convention or a police department.
2. 500 mL of wine (if verified) is 2/3 of a bottle, not drunk alcoholic rage quantity see 1. If he blew like 0.4, it seems to me it would be reported as part of the article.
3. The guy bought one gun and is a Brit, not a born and raised gun toting southerner.
4. Reasonable doubt. While I’m as big an antifer as the next guy on Lemmy, nothing good comes from jumping to conclusions and misrepresenting the facts of the situation by sensationalizing the title or not putting all the information in the summary. Again, see 1.

I’ve been trying to play it on switch and it’s basically impossible with 2 sticks. Also it’s really jarring after a few hundred hours in breath of the wild.

I roughed it like that in college with a book and a hookah, but a little bigger is a lot better to me if you’re average height or taller. Otherwise it’s tough to get knees and nipples in the water at the same time.

It’s not the same it is way better.

Not the shower/tub combo bath, those kinda suck, but a jacuzzi or soaking tub with a book is excellent.

Now now.

It could have been AM radio in the tractor.

A great article the author didn’t even proofread.

Remember your tarot cards to help you deal with “CyThe cynicism” you develop when you get bogged down, the same way you do all that doomsday prep!

I’m not saying there isn’t some potentially good stuff in here, but this article is clickbait publishing for its own sake.

This is demonstrably true by experiment, but I think it has to have at least SOME value. Like you can give a drink or buy them a candy bar before you ask for something and they are more likely to donate more money to your cause. It’s called “influence debt” I believe and is discussed pretty palatably in “Influence” by Robert Cialdini. Unfortunately I couldn’t find my notes on it with a quick search.