dream_weasel

Exactly. Adding bad examples makes it seem like you couldn’t get 10 good ones which is obviously not true.

But sucking bros sucks bro if you suck the R instead of the D bro.

Pretty weak 10. Pick one or two and make a compelling article, I’m already trying to quit. We don’t have to make up stuff like “JFC nuclear power!?”

I’d give you $20 for it ;)

People are looking for “king sized sheets” of “paper towel holder” not gtx4070ti super from gigabyte or esp32 chipset bullshit is how. Most people are getting basic shit, not trying to get around Newegg or a PC parts supplier.

That’s not a real sharp take tbf.

Sucks to suck bro.

First sentence of each paragraph: correct.

Basically all the rest is bunk besides the fact that you can’t count on always getting reliable information. Right answers (especially for something that is technical but non-verifiable), wrong reasons.

There are “stochastic language models” I suppose (e.g., click the middle suggestion from your phone after typing the first word to create a message), but something like chatgpt or perplexity or deepseek are not that, beyond using tokenization / word2vect-like setups to make human readable text. These are a lot more like “don’t trust everything you read on Wikipedia” than a randomized acid drop response.

Drape

Victual the affluent.

So do we all sign back into our old reddit accounts to say “Luigi” until permaban?

You can fellate Winnie the Pooh on your own time. It comes with its own whole set of problems.

Edit: Come at me tankies. You’re morons for giving a single dollar to the CCP.