

I guess I have no expectations for Trump to take anything positive away from this meeting.
But think in private he’s more likely to let Mamdani talk. In public it would just be a pissing contest for him.


I guess I have no expectations for Trump to take anything positive away from this meeting.
But think in private he’s more likely to let Mamdani talk. In public it would just be a pissing contest for him.


I just don’t think that’s the purpose of them talking. It’s not meant to be a public fight between 2 people, which is what it would turn into.
I imagine Trump will possibly be more receptive to Mamdani’s comments in that private than in public.


Honestly, I think this is the best option. Nothing good would have come of their conversation being in public.
I’ll check it out!
Is he the good guy?


Aren’t those democratic voters so violent!

deleted by creator


Just in time


To tell him he’s NEVER going back to mar-a-Lago AGAIN! Cause he’s a creep! Good Trump!


Always projecting


The bill says Bondi can redact parts of the records that “contain personally identifiable information” about victims that would “constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”
Nobody plays the victim better than Republicans. Gonna have to redact all of them.


Rising energy costs are can be blamed on AI too.
Cook for your wife at least once a week no exceptions. Not takeout. Cook a meal. If she works also, then cooking and cleaning responsibilities should be split 50%.


For reference, the opposing party always has an advantage during non presidential election years.


Illinois is already heavily gerrymandered. More so than Texas even.


He must have misread the legislation. Stupid mundane details.


The CA proposed maps were a part of the legislation.


The government loves this shit. They’d never get rid of loopholes like this.
Not every conversation needs to be public.