This will kill EV adoption, just to put it into perspective this is the equivalent of an average ICE car (38.6MPG) having 25.5p added per litre of fuel, in a single budget.

The even more ridiculous thing is plug in hybrids are 1.5p per mile, so people with 80+ miles of range in their Golfs etc. will pay half price, even though they are needlessly dragging around an internal combustion engine for 99% of their journeys.

  • manualoverride@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It was you talking about fairness.

    No, it wasn’t, I didn’t mention fairness because that is not my point at all, my focus is moving away from ICE vehicles.

    prefer vehicles to be taxed according to their weight?

    As long as all safety system weight is removed from the calculation then maybe! We don’t want companies sacrificing safety for weight reduction.

    Also significant changes should only apply to new vehicles, so the rules don’t change retrospectively after people have already made significant financial decisions based on government policy.

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      No, it wasn’t, I didn’t mention fairness because that is not my point at all

      That you?:

      In order to introduce this they needed to apply it to both ICE and EVs equally

      Normal cars are taxed per your own calculations twice as much as EVs. That is far away from “equal” treatment but at least EVs owners now will START contributing.

      • manualoverride@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Fairness and equality are different words and mean different things, you also cut off the second half of that quote in an attempt to prove your point.