When bittorrent was released, I saw the technological aspects as groundbreaking, thinking it would be repurposed for much more than ISO downloads and mass media distribution. How did the technology not become a more popular way of distributing via crowdsourcing large community datasets, such as openstreetmaps, or something like distribution of Android rom updates, when the costs of distribution are so expensive?

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    What are you even rambling about? Torrent has been essential.

    IPFS, as well as many other P2P sharing technologies, on the other hand…

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      that’s because the tech people think p2p is what made bittorrent popular. It didn’t. Free stuff being available on it is what did.

      • FG_3479@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        P2P being what made it popular is still the truth. It democratises media distribution as you do not have to pay for expensive hosting or cloud storage, meaning you can download pirate files without having to pay Turbobit, Rapidgator or other service for a speed faster than a few hundred kb/s.