“We’ve had hundreds and hundreds, if not, you know, closer to 1,000 threats," Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) told NBC News.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) said the number of threats against her exploded after Donald Trump posted social media messages targeting Democrats on Thursday.

“We’ve had hundreds and hundreds, if not, you know, closer to 1,000 threats,” Slotkin, one of the six Democrats featured in a video that provoked Trump’s ire, told NBC News’s Ryan Nobles.

On Thursday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said they’d looked into security for the lawmakers who appeared in a video released earlier this week. In the video, Slotkin and five other Democratic veterans and former intelligence officers reminded service members that they could “refuse illegal orders” from the administration.

  • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    10 hours ago

    well, i sure am grateful that the fbi and doj will be fully investigating and arresting these people threatening congress….

    for real it can’t be that hard to do… i bet the majority of them don’t know how to use proxies or leaked their identities somewhere…
    yet i never hear about them being prosecuted.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m not really sure how locality plays into that. If this all happened in DC then there is no state government to handle the situation. Perhaps the state governments of the state that either the congress member or the person threatening them is from could prosecute them but I’m honestly not sure.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That might be useful information if the left could muster the courage to do something more than talk shit about them on Twitter

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I mean, Trump controls all the departments that would be involved in that process so it’s not really a matter of worthiness at all. Criminals don’t investigate themselves with any kind of impartiality. But, if you were to somehow convince the DOJ to follow through and convict these people against Trump’s wishes he would just pardon them. That’s the reality of the situation. The ideal outcome isn’t anywhere near this picture.

          • paraphrand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Yes, but a pardon implies the process worked. And I think it’s important because sane people will understand the outcome.

            But I guess, as others have pointed out, that’s not justice. So prosecution post the possibility of pardon does make sense.

            What a fucked up situation.

        • troglodytis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If you can’t play the roll of party loyalist, you’re not working for the DOJ. I’m fine waiting until that is over to begin prosecutions