Your argument is, ‘it can’t be art - a child can do it.’
Can children make art? Like, the way you understand art gets made. If a kid picking up Stable Diffusion in a week proves it’s never art, what is the impact of a child who paints real good after very little practice?
Is that my argument? Cool! I guess my work is done here. You go ahead and debate the point you think I’m making. It’ll save me a whole lot of time, and you get to pretend to win!
I literally proved you it requires skills by providing a page of example workflows. Are you still hallucinating?
No, you provided an example of how it’s difficult for YOU. Children can learn to create AI “art” within a week.
And a talented child artist would have what impact on your argument here?
A talented child artist wouldn’t use AI.
That was not the question.
The question is irrelevant. If the child has talent, they wouldn’t use AI. Moot point.
No.
Your argument is, ‘it can’t be art - a child can do it.’
Can children make art? Like, the way you understand art gets made. If a kid picking up Stable Diffusion in a week proves it’s never art, what is the impact of a child who paints real good after very little practice?
Is that my argument? Cool! I guess my work is done here. You go ahead and debate the point you think I’m making. It’ll save me a whole lot of time, and you get to pretend to win!
We both get something out of it!
What the fuck are you saying, if not that?
If you can’t be corrected when you misread someone else’s argument you’re just saying words recreationally.