I thought it was a pretty bizarre idea, to submit real art to a garbage fake art contest. And then post about it like it makes an obvious point or something. Not sure why they did that or what they think it means that they won
Edit: I take it the downvoters don’t understand it either.
Human art, even when claimed to be AI, conveys emotion and connects with people through it. Generative images lack the expression of emotion, and so they are found lacking connection when compared to art from a human of even moderate skill.
so their art is so bad it was mistaken for ai? weird flex but ok.
More like, “This is the only one that doesn’t look like shit.”
more like “ooble gooble mordi bordi”
Good point.
Well yeah, if you put it that way…
Another win for ricky.
You may want to sharpen that edge of yours…. It’s pretty dull.
Like a cold butter knife through concrete.
Well put.
But consider the old adage that a dull knife is a dangerous knife.
No, Ricky. There’s nothing dangerous about your trolling. It’s just cringy.
Blocking you now, so… feel free to respond!
It won an AI art competition… because all the actual AI art was shit
I thought it was a pretty bizarre idea, to submit real art to a garbage fake art contest. And then post about it like it makes an obvious point or something. Not sure why they did that or what they think it means that they won
Edit: I take it the downvoters don’t understand it either.
Human art, even when claimed to be AI, conveys emotion and connects with people through it. Generative images lack the expression of emotion, and so they are found lacking connection when compared to art from a human of even moderate skill.
i mean, if the contest has a prize it’d be some easy money and practice. nobody wants to be a starving artist
I guess that’s true. I just wouldn’t want the stank of AI on my work