Is she the victim, though? From what I understand, the guy wasn’t at the door, but asleep (or pretending to be) in his own home, which should be entirely legal. The “more info” link says the door was ajar and she filmed him. If she pushed open the door, entered his home and filmed him there, she might be the sex offender here.
Of course if he set this up intentionally, that’s exhibitionism (not voyeurism, as the article incorrectly calls it), but still, inside his own home. I feel like that should be a safe place where you can dress or undress however you like. Although being visible from the outside might be an issue. I think this issue hinges on whether she had to push open the door or enter his home to see him exposed.
Naturists are often naked in their home. Lots of people are naked after a shower. He could have gotten home tired, order food, have a quick shower, and crash on the couch after that.
A deliverer should just ring the doorbell and wait at the door, not enter uninvited or try to peer inside.
I mean, it could have been an intentional exhibitionist setup, but it doesn’t have to be. And entering someone’s home and filming them sleeping naked, sounds a lot creepier to me.
I mean, the guy could be a creep, but he could be innocent too. She might be the innocent victim, but she might also be the creep here. We only hear her side of the story.
I’m sure she wasn’t trying to be the creep, but her reaction of posting the video online of the customer was absolutely out of line. That’s evidence for your own possible cases maybe, but certainly not for indiscriminate sharing.
Except if they’re actually correct about what happened then you’re just ignoring the facts of the issue to just label some random guy a creep based on faulty info and judging people for wanting to know what actually happened
Exactly. Look, if the guy is a creep and set this up intentionally, then shame on him and I hope at the very least he gets banned from door dash. I’m just saying we’re only hearing one side of the story, and there seems to be some questionable aspects to that side, so I’m a bit reluctant to judge the guy based on that.
I’m all for condemning creeps when it’s clear that they are creeps. I’m just a bit reluctant to judge someone on so little and somewhat vague evidence.
Blaming the victim and defending the pervert isn’t a good look.
Is she the victim, though? From what I understand, the guy wasn’t at the door, but asleep (or pretending to be) in his own home, which should be entirely legal. The “more info” link says the door was ajar and she filmed him. If she pushed open the door, entered his home and filmed him there, she might be the sex offender here.
Of course if he set this up intentionally, that’s exhibitionism (not voyeurism, as the article incorrectly calls it), but still, inside his own home. I feel like that should be a safe place where you can dress or undress however you like. Although being visible from the outside might be an issue. I think this issue hinges on whether she had to push open the door or enter his home to see him exposed.
Yeah, ordering delivery then getting naked seems like normal behavior.
Can’t they leave the food at your door?
Why’d he leave the door wide open?
Order food > leave door open > get naked inside
Doesn’t take a genius to put two amd teo together
I wasn’t talking about this specific situation. Just in general. Can’t you ask them just to leave it and then being naked or not isn’t a problem.
It does sound like drunk behaviour. Or maybe even old person behaviour.
Naturists are often naked in their home. Lots of people are naked after a shower. He could have gotten home tired, order food, have a quick shower, and crash on the couch after that.
A deliverer should just ring the doorbell and wait at the door, not enter uninvited or try to peer inside.
I mean, it could have been an intentional exhibitionist setup, but it doesn’t have to be. And entering someone’s home and filming them sleeping naked, sounds a lot creepier to me.
I mean, the guy could be a creep, but he could be innocent too. She might be the innocent victim, but she might also be the creep here. We only hear her side of the story.
I’m sure she wasn’t trying to be the creep, but her reaction of posting the video online of the customer was absolutely out of line. That’s evidence for your own possible cases maybe, but certainly not for indiscriminate sharing.
Oof, people digging deeper to justify this creep is making this thread real weird
Except if they’re actually correct about what happened then you’re just ignoring the facts of the issue to just label some random guy a creep based on faulty info and judging people for wanting to know what actually happened
Exactly. Look, if the guy is a creep and set this up intentionally, then shame on him and I hope at the very least he gets banned from door dash. I’m just saying we’re only hearing one side of the story, and there seems to be some questionable aspects to that side, so I’m a bit reluctant to judge the guy based on that.
I’m all for condemning creeps when it’s clear that they are creeps. I’m just a bit reluctant to judge someone on so little and somewhat vague evidence.
Walking into someone’s home and complaining you saw him naked is not assault.