• imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I am failing to understand how come a choice of a person or bad parenting should be enforced. Like if a person wants to drink more of sugary drinks he likes, it is purely up to him, right? Or parents letting their children drink as much as they want. That shit is purely on a customer. Why would anyone regulate that? Focus on other things like littering, public smoking and drinking, drug selling. This hast to be one of the least important things to regulate.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They can drink as much as they like. There’s nothing stopping someone buying another drink.

      Obesity is a huge public health concern that should be treated seriously and we should be steering our culture into making better health decisions.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Because 64% of adults are overweight or obese, with 26% being in the heavier classification. Thats a doubling in a decade. It’s costing the NHS £11 billion per year, and 13% of hospital admissions in 2023 were due to being overweight. The cost to the economy through sick days, reduced productivity and premature death is around £100bn per year.

      Obesity now kills more than drinking or smoking in England and Scotland. There is already a bill in parliament for a phased total smoking ban.

      • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah turns out people were incapable of making good decisions on their own. Which is fine, unless you’re asking everyone around you to pay for it.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You can have free refills of coke if a bit of alcohol is added…

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It also says no added sugar, so they should be able to refill my vodka orange as much as they want because the sugar in orange juice is natural.

      What a wonderful law.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Please tell me it’s just England and Wales please tell me it’s just England and Wales

  • Apocalypteroid@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    If customers are allowed to help themselves then it’s totally unenforcible. It’s not like the restaurants are going to police this and a sticker isn’t going to deter anyone!

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Not at all unenforcable. Just needs an RFID on the cup or on a token handed out by staff.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Probably the best solution honestly… In chain restaurants that don’t offer free refills, I quite frequently just take one anyway. Nobody ever stops me. If I asked they might say no, but I don’t ask.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Pretty much no one will ever enforce it. It will be interesting to see what happens when some jobsworth does though.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Ol’ Nigel is chuckling his way in the front door, ffs. What is Labour doing?

  • tal@olio.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The notice reads: “Want Coca-Cola Classic? It’s one glass only.

    “Based on new government laws, we’ve had to limit Coca-Cola Classic to one glass per customer.

    “Still thirsty? Help yourself to any of our low-sugar fizzy Bottomless Soft Drinks.”

    Under the new rules, any soft drinks that are low in sugar, for example ‘Zero’ alternative versions of most popular soft drink brands, can be drunk to one’s heart’s content.

    I imagine that manufacturers of artificial sweeteners are in for a good time.

  • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    They should offer a loisence for 1 extra sugar drink if you finish your mushy peas.

  • Anomie-maxxing@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    How long before coca cola launch an unsweetened version and Nandos lets your Bring Your Own Bag (of sugar)?

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This only affects sugary drinks, so their Zero and diet options should be exempt. Although a book I read recently was showing evidence that artificial sweeteners can also drive obesity, so we might start seeing things affecting those drinks too.

    • tal@olio.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If you put sugar in granulated or powdered solid form into soda, it’ll create a lot of convection points and the soda will rapidly foam up and lose a lot of its carbon dioxide.

      You could use a sweet syrup instead.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      A bill to phase out smoking is working through the parliamentary process at the moment. It will introduce a progressive ban so those aged 15 when it passes will never legally smoke, licencing for the sale of tobacco and vape products, and the power to ban smoking near hospitals and schools.

      • threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        We tried that in NZ, then conservatives got in power and just pressed ctrl z. Their argument was that tobacco taxes provided more income than that lost to public healthcare, but that was just a boldfaced lie.

        Conservatives are literally a cancer on society.

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Banning near hospitals should be a good one. Beggars belief it’s not already a thing.

        When I’ve been, there’s a no smoking sign in front of the entrance and several patients stood in front of it looking like death having either a giant vape or chain smoking.

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It’s not enforced though. A recorded voice will come over the tannoy and say “no smoking, something something” and everyone carries on with their day.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    In order to be consistent they’ll need to start charging tax per lump of sugar as well.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes… that is the topic of discussion. I’m just saying it’s manifestly unfair if they apply that tax to refills of your cup at Nando’s, but don’t charge extra for each lump of sugar in a cup of tea.