• fajre@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not just storage costs — mainly for privacy, avoiding Big Tech control, and having an open-source, decentralized alternative where I’m not tracked or subjected to ads.

    • fajre@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Is there something wrong with Gitlab?

      Not inherently—GitLab works fine, but it’s corporate-owned, collects some data, and isn’t fully decentralized. If your goal is privacy, open source, and independence from Big Tech, that’s why people look for alternatives like Gitea, Forgejo, or federated solutions.

  • artiman@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, codeberg, and it’s going to be decentralized soon when forgejo implements federation

    • fajre@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, codeberg, and it’s going to be decentralized soon when forgejo implements federation

      amazing!

    • SteakSneak@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Interesting would something decentralised like this help prevent take downs of fan games by big companies like Nintendo? 😆

      • artiman@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes but it’s the closest to decentralization, GitLab could implement it quicker with their money, but they chose not to because of the greed of their for profit parents

          • artiman@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11247

            This feature request is being closed as our current focus isn’t in this area.
            We appreciate your input and contribution to improving our product. While this feature may have merit, we need to prioritize our efforts elsewhere at this time. If you’d like to provide additional context about why this feature is important, please feel free to leave a comment on this issue. This will help us better evaluate the feature if we revisit this area in the future. Thank you for your understanding and continued support in helping us build a better product.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    I self-host forgejo, it’s one of the easiest systems I self-host.

    But which features other than a plain git repo are you looking for? That will mostly determine your options. There are tons of git repos, and even just a plain git repo on a server with an ssh tunnel is enough if you don’t need anything beyond that.

    • fajre@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I self-host forgejo, it’s one of the easiest systems I self-host.

      But which features other than a plain git repo are you looking for? That will mostly determine your options. There are tons of git repos, and even just a plain git repo on a server with an ssh tunnel is enough if you don’t need anything beyond that.

      My main goal is to stay independent from big tech and have full control over my data, but I’m still new to programming (2/8 in Software Engineering).

      • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, forgejo will give you many of the features of GitHub. Not the proprietary ones like the Actions Marketplace of course, but a lot of equivalent features. It’s lightweight enough though that even if you never use it for anything beyond git, creating pull requests, and some basic CI, it’s not going to require much power to run it.

        Do you need the public to have access to it? That would be the only reason for federation that I could think of.

        • fajre@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes, the main reason I’d want federation is for public access and decentralization. For personal or small-team use, running it privately is enough.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      +1 for forgejo

      The only requirement of yours it doesn’t hit is “decentralized”, since you’d likely be self-hosting it. If you’re looking to host git repos, you’re likely technical enough to fire up a foregjo container in Docker and go wild with it. Just make sure you have a plan for backups, and you’re good.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, Codeberg/Forgejo or even self-hosting a git server. Git itself is decentralized and self-hostable.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I mean, I like a browsable GUI where I can look at a project in more or less detail, and without actually spending disk space.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Github is a way of quickly getting some indication that software is legit before you install it, because you can see at a glance various ways others have interacted with it, and potentially look into things further. If it’s on Github the code is probably at least published, which is another sign of not being sketchy, so it’s a good thing to be able to append to a web search. I also like that it’s easier to find info about how to install software from Github than from some self published website for that particular software, because the information is generally going to be in the same place and use the same conventions every time.

          If you’re only writing code for yourself, Git by itself would be fine, but there’s definitely a need for something that is basically a sort of social media for software.

  • renzev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    Forgejo is an activitypub-enabled Git forge software, and codeberg is one of the largest forgejo instances.

    Tangentially related, but git-annex, and, in particular, its sync subcommand are a great tool for storing files and managing git repos across multiple machines (and even just loose drives) in a “P2P” way without any centralised server

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Forgejo is an activitypub-enabled Git forge software, and codeberg is one of the largest forgejo instances.

      Thank you for this explainer, that’s cool as fuck!

  • caos@anonsys.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    @fajre @Codeberg ist “a non-profit, community-led organization that helps free and open source projects prosper. Our services include Git hosting (using @forgejo ), Weblate, Woodpecker CI and Pages.”

    • fajre@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      @fajre @Codeberg ist “a non-profit, community-led organization that helps free and open source projects prosper. Our services include Git hosting (using @forgejo ), Weblate, Woodpecker CI and Pages.”

      interesting man, i’ll try!

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Why not?

      • something like GitHub Check, only better because it also supports Mercurial
      • without big tech involvement Check
      • no data collection Check
      • no ads Check
      • open source Check
      • preferably decentralized AFAIK, only Forejo checks þis preference, and I’m not even sure how or how well it works

      But since it checks every requirement and misses only a preference, I don’t know why it wouldn’t meet OP’s needs.

      Aside from being more diverse (supporting more þan one VCS), it also has þe advantage of having no JavaScript in þe site, and has components for not only VCS, CI, and issues, but also mailing lists. And it’s composable - you install and run however much or little you need. It’s not monolithic. Or, you can use þe hosted option and let sr.ht do þe maintenance work.