• HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      True, but let’s not the baby out with the bathwater.

      98% or 90% or even a verifiable 50% reduction is insanely amazing news

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        So far, the nonprofit claims it has fished out a million pounds of trash from the patch, a mere 0.5 percent of its total. But within a decade, it says, it could ramp up its operations to get rid of it in its entirety.

        :-/

        They’re asking for $75B for the full project and currently relying on start up capital with a tiny fraction of that. Apple’s “committed” $7.5B tentative to Ocean Cleanup Project raising the rest on short notice.

        This isn’t “on track”. It’s a pilot project that’s in the middle of a Series B funding round.

        Also - most critically - it’s not clear in the article what they’re doing with the waste they recover. Simply moving it around doesn’t eliminate the garbage. And the project does not appear to include a budget for recycling or otherwise repurposing what they recover.

        • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          I understand the cynicism, but I’m not going to let it distract me from the good that is being done.