• HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    True, but let’s not the baby out with the bathwater.

    98% or 90% or even a verifiable 50% reduction is insanely amazing news

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      So far, the nonprofit claims it has fished out a million pounds of trash from the patch, a mere 0.5 percent of its total. But within a decade, it says, it could ramp up its operations to get rid of it in its entirety.

      :-/

      They’re asking for $75B for the full project and currently relying on start up capital with a tiny fraction of that. Apple’s “committed” $7.5B tentative to Ocean Cleanup Project raising the rest on short notice.

      This isn’t “on track”. It’s a pilot project that’s in the middle of a Series B funding round.

      Also - most critically - it’s not clear in the article what they’re doing with the waste they recover. Simply moving it around doesn’t eliminate the garbage. And the project does not appear to include a budget for recycling or otherwise repurposing what they recover.

      • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        I understand the cynicism, but I’m not going to let it distract me from the good that is being done.