• jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Yep, as long as the employer is the one paying the $100k, this is actually a good change.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Employers are the ones generally sponsoring these visas, but when they cost more than hiring domestically, maybe that’ll change.

        • plz1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Look up the Hire Act of 2025. I think the GOP is finally doing something helpful. Somehing about a clock being right, twice a day, etc.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Good grief, what a great idea. This is the kind of thing that progressive and even moderate Democrats should be doing. It’s weird to see the GOP reverse themselves of decades of “free trade” dogma and, on some things at least, starting to sound like the kinds of things you’d hear left-leaning people say in daily life. Given that it’s the GOP, I have to suspect the motives, but still…

            I think a good idea would be to give companies some time to adapt, with a planned hike, constantly making it more and more steep. Something like 25% now as the act proposes, raising it 10-15% every year, to hit some max planned amount, but then revisiting and adjusting year after year, based on whatever variables would be relevant, like how many Americans are estimated to be out of work in related sector(s), etc.